California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2450

Introduced
2/19/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/12/20  
Report Pass
5/12/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Report Pass
5/19/20  
Report Pass
5/19/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Refer
6/15/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Refer
8/1/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/27/20  
Chaptered
9/9/20  
Chaptered
9/9/20  
Passed
9/9/20  

Caption

Air ambulance services.

Impact

The bill's implementation means that the counties and courts will be mandated to continue collecting this financial penalty until July 1, 2024, after which the provisions would become inoperative. The focus is on maintaining a dedicated funding source for emergency air transportation services which plays a vital role in healthcare, particularly in rural areas where access to hospital facilities may be limited.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2450, aimed at continuing funding for air ambulance services through the Emergency Medical Air Transportation and Children's Coverage Fund, amends a previous law which imposed a $4 penalty on various Vehicle Code violations. The bill seeks to extend the application of this penalty by an additional year, ensuring that revenues continue to flow into this fund, which supports critical emergency medical services. This extension is important in maintaining financial stability for air ambulance providers and ensuring children’s healthcare coverage through Medi-Cal.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding AB 2450 was supportive among healthcare advocates who emphasize the importance of continuous funding for emergency services. Some concerns were noted regarding the bill's imposition on local jurisdictions, as the enforcement of penalties may affect how local governments respond to transportation-related offences and manage their own budgets. However, advocates argue that without these funds, vital emergency services face potential jeopardy.

Contention

Notably, a point of contention arises from the provision stating that no reimbursement is required from the state for costs incurred by local agencies due to this legislation. Critics argue that this could place an undue financial burden on local governments, which may need to adjust their budgets to accommodate the extended penalty collection requirement. The debate reflects a tension between immediate funding needs for healthcare services and the fiscal responsibilities of local jurisdictions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1104

Air ambulance services.

CA AB2648

Air ambulance services.

CA AB1410

Penalty assessments: emergency services and children’s health care coverage funding.

CA AB482

Air ambulance services.

CA AB3226

Emergency Medical Air Transportation Act.

CA AB2593

Air ambulance services.

CA AB651

Air ambulance services.