School finance: necessary small schools.
The legislation directly influences how funding is calculated for small schools, potentially providing them with more stable financial resources. By allowing allocations to be based on the highest funding levels from recent years, the bill supports schools that might be experiencing fluctuating enrollment numbers. This could lead to improved budgeting and planning for smaller educational institutions, which often struggle with financial constraints.
AB2651, introduced by Assembly Member Megan Dahle, amends Section 42280 of the Education Code concerning school finance for necessary small schools in California. The bill outlines a modification to the funding allocation process so that it allows the Superintendent of Public Instruction to compute allocations based on the greater of the current year's average daily attendance or the highest funding amount from the past two or three fiscal years, rather than just the prior year. This approach aims to ensure that necessary small schools receive adequate financial support based on their performance over multiple years.
The sentiment around AB2651 is largely supportive among educational stakeholders, particularly those involved with small schools. Advocates argue that this amendment is vital for ensuring that necessary small schools have the necessary resources to provide quality education. However, there may be apprehension from budget watchdogs and fiscal conservatives who are concerned about the potential for increasing overall educational spending without corresponding oversight.
Some points of contention include debates over whether the changes may inadvertently incentivize schools to maintain lower enrollment numbers to secure better funding, or whether sufficiently funding all schools should take precedence. Critics may question whether the new funding model is sustainable in the long term, considering California's complex budget dynamics and competing financial demands.