California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB267

Introduced
1/24/19  
Introduced
1/24/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Enrolled
8/30/19  
Chaptered
9/12/19  
Chaptered
9/12/19  
Passed
9/12/19  

Caption

Employment of infants: entertainment industry.

Impact

The implementation of AB267 will affect state laws by broadening the scope of regulations concerning infant employment in the entertainment industry. By imposing stricter requirements, the legislation aims to enhance child welfare protections, recognizing that infants are particularly vulnerable and need thorough medical scrutiny before engaging in any form of work. As the bill introduces penalties for violations, it emphasizes accountability among employers and guardians, creating a more structured framework for monitoring compliance with child labor laws in California.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 267, also known as AB267, amends existing labor laws regarding the employment of infants in the entertainment industry in California. The primary purpose of this bill is to expand certification requirements for infants under one month of age for employment in various entertainment sectors. It mandates that such infants must receive written certification from a qualified physician confirming their health and capability to handle the working conditions. Specifically, this legislation aims to enhance child protection protocols by ensuring infants are medically fit to work in potentially stressful projects in the entertainment sector, including film and television productions.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB267 appears to be largely supportive among advocates of child safety and labor protections. Proponents argue that the requirements will safeguard children from the potential risks associated with work in the entertainment field. However, there may be varied opinions among industry professionals, particularly those in the entertainment sector, who could see the expanded regulations as an additional burden. This reflects a broader conversation regarding balancing child welfare and the operational realities of the entertainment industry.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding AB267 is the balance between ensuring child safety while allowing flexibility within the entertainment industry. Critics might argue that the expanded regulations could inadvertently complicate or hinder productions that wish to employ infants, leading to potential delays or increased costs. The bill's creation of new misdemeanors for violations could be viewed as an overreach in regulation, with some stakeholders advocating for a more balanced approach that still prioritizes children's welfare without placing excessive constraints on the industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1622

Family physicians.

CA AB2388

Employment: minors.

CA AB2451

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising: theaters.

CA AB3139

Alcoholic beverages: licensees.

CA AB1349

Consumer protection: ticket sellers.

CA SB1164

Craft distillers.

CA AB2896

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

CA SB914

Firearms.