California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2738

Introduced
2/20/20  
Introduced
2/20/20  

Caption

Highway Users Tax Account: apportionment to counties: expenditure.

Impact

The implications of AB 2738 are significant as it mandates that funds should be spent equitably across the counties to address the most urgent needs for street and road enhancements. This aspect is critical in ensuring that resources are allocated to areas that require it the most, particularly in regions where infrastructure may be deteriorating. The requirement for counties to collaborate with local cities before fund expenditures aims to enhance cooperative transportation initiatives and improve local road conditions, potentially leading to better-maintained public pathways overall.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2738, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, proposes amendments to Section 2150 of the Streets and Highways Code, modifying how counties can utilize funds from the Highway Users Tax Account. Currently, counties receive distributions from this account based on registered vehicles and maintained roads and are required to use those funds solely for specific road and highway purposes. This bill broadens the scope, allowing counties to expend these funds not only for county roads but for any streets and roads within their jurisdiction, thus promoting a more flexible approach to road funding and improvements.

Contention

While AB 2738 is aimed at fostering better management of local road infrastructures and promoting regional collaboration, there may also be contentions regarding the administrative responsibilities it imposes on county boards. The stipulated requirement for consultation with cities to identify collaborative projects may introduce complexities into the budgeting and planning processes, leading to calls for state reimbursements for any additional costs incurred by local agencies. Opponents may argue that while the intent is noble, the practical implications could lead to bureaucratic delays.

Additional_points

Moreover, the bill contains provisions that ensure the state is responsible for reimbursing local governments should the Commission on State Mandates deem the costs imposed by the legislation as state mandates. This aspect aligns with California's constitutional requirement to maintain financial equity between state and local obligations. Overall, AB 2738 emphasizes a shift towards collective decision-making in transportation projects, with a goal to create a unified approach to addressing the transportation needs across California's counties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB475

Transportation planning: sustainable communities strategies.

CA AB1025

Transportation: California Transportation Commission: San Ramon Branch Corridor: reimbursement.

CA SB63

San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation funding.

CA AB1147

Regional transportation plan: Active Transportation Program.

CA SB1363

Regional transportation plans: sustainable communities strategies: greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled reduction targets.

CA AB558

Fresno County Transportation Authority.

CA AB1352

Community mental health services: mental health boards.

CA AB1057

Oil and gas: Geologic Energy Management Division: wells and facilities: disposition and acquisition notices: indemnity bonds and remediation: additional security: civil penalty.