California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2850

Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
7/8/20  
Report Pass
7/8/20  
Refer
7/8/20  
Refer
7/8/20  
Report Pass
7/28/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Report Pass
8/12/20  
Refer
8/12/20  
Refer
8/12/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  
Passed
9/29/20  

Caption

Public transit employer-employee relations: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

Impact

The bill reinforces the jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board to oversee and enforce labor relations protocols within BART. By requiring compliance with statutory obligations to bargain in good faith and adjudicate complaints of labor violations, AB2850 improves protections for employees and ensures that the district is held accountable for its labor practices. Furthermore, the legislation recognizes the necessity of providing a special statute for BART due to its distinct operational dynamics and challenges, rather than applying broader state labor laws indiscriminately.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2850 addresses employer-employee relations specifically for the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), amending existing legislation regarding its governance and employee rights. This bill mandates that the district must provide reasonable notice to employee representatives prior to making changes that affect working conditions, thereby enhancing communication and negotiation rights of employees. The intent of the legislation is to foster a more structured and transparent framework for labor relations within the BART district, which has unique operational needs compared to other public transit agencies in California.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB2850 has been supportive, particularly among labor advocates who view the bill as a necessary step towards strengthening labor rights within the public transit sector. Supporters highlight the need for robust mechanisms that protect employee interests and ensure fair treatment. However, there may also be underlying concerns regarding increased administrative burdens on the district, as the bill establishes additional requirements for compliance. This aspect has generated a mixed response, balancing the need for worker representation against the operational realities faced by the transit district.

Contention

While AB2850 promotes labor rights and facilitates better communications between BART and its employees, there are potential contentions regarding its implementation. Critics might argue that the increased regulatory measures can complicate administrative processes and lead to disputes in labor relations, potentially affecting the efficiency of operations. Additionally, the requirement for negotiation on changes to working conditions must be managed carefully to avoid delays in operational decision-making, which could impinge on service delivery expectations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB598

Sacramento Regional Transit District: employee relations.

CA SB957

Public Employment Relations Board: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: employee relations.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB314

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB969

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB2048

Collective bargaining: Legislature.