California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3153

Introduced
2/21/20  
Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Report Pass
6/2/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/23/20  

Caption

Parking and zoning: bicycle and car-share parking credits.

Impact

The bill is designed to impact local ordinances across California, mandating that cities and counties provide parking credits to eligible applicants. This creates a uniform framework that will apply statewide, addressing what the legislature deems to be matters of statewide concern rather than local affairs. The framework also includes specific conditions that must be met for parking reductions, including the provision of designated long-term bicycle parking spaces or permanent car-sharing spaces as part of the development projects.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3153, introduced by Assembly Member Robert Rivas, seeks to amend the planning and zoning laws in California by introducing provisions for parking credits related to bicycle and car-share parking options. The bill aims to incentivize the development of residential housing projects while accommodating modern, sustainable transport options. By allowing developers to apply for credits that exempt them from certain minimum parking requirements, it encourages the inclusion of non-motorized transport facilities, thereby potentially reducing reliance on cars in urban settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 3153 appears to be generally supportive among proponents of sustainable urban development, who view it as a progressive step towards modernizing housing policies in line with environmental goals. However, concerns have been raised about the potential impacts on parking availability and urban planning by local governments that may fear losing their regulatory power over parking standards. Supporters believe that the bill promotes more flexible and economically viable housing solutions, while some local authorities worry it might complicate local zoning efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the bill's mandate that overrides local regulations, which some local leaders may consider an encroachment on their autonomy. Critics argue that it may lead to inadequate parking solutions in areas where local conditions necessitate stricter regulations. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate about how the reduction of motor vehicle parking spaces may affect the infrastructure needs of growing urban populations, with stakeholders divided on the balance between facilitating bike and car-share options while ensuring enough parking for those who depend on cars.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1610

Developmental services: regional centers.

CA AB2522

Developmental services.

CA AB881

Accessory dwelling units.

CA AB430

Housing development: Camp Fire Housing Assistance Act of 2019.

CA AB2923

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: transit-oriented development.

CA SB330

Housing Crisis Act of 2019.

CA AB1279

Planning and zoning: housing development: high-opportunity areas.

CA SB1369

Adaptive reuse projects: by-right: funding.