California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3164

Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/14/20  
Report Pass
5/14/20  
Refer
5/14/20  
Refer
5/14/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
8/7/20  
Report Pass
8/7/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Report Pass
8/21/20  
Report Pass
8/21/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Vetoed
9/29/20  

Caption

Fire prevention: wildland-urban interface wildfire risk model: model use guidelines.

Impact

AB 3164 effectively amends the Public Resources Code by establishing a framework for classifying lands in accordance with fire hazard severity. By introducing a systematic assessment through the wildfire risk model, the legislation intends to ensure that resources and strategies are properly allocated to reduce wildfire risks in both local and state responsibility areas. Enhanced guidelines and legislative oversight seek to improve cooperation between local agencies and the state in fire prevention efforts, ultimately promoting community resilience against wildfires.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3164, introduced by Assembly Member Friedman, focuses on enhancing fire prevention strategies within California, particularly targeting the wildland-urban interface. The bill mandates the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to develop a wildfire risk model by July 1, 2022, which will assess the fire risks associated with specific communities or parcels. This model aims to incorporate various mitigating factors such as defensible space compliance, meeting building standards, and community fire prevention efforts to foster safer living conditions in fire-prone areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 3164 has been largely supportive, reflecting a recognition of the importance of proactive measures in combating wildfire risks. Legislators and environmental advocates highlight the bill as a vital step toward strengthening California's approach to fire prevention. However, concerns regarding funding and implementation raise questions about the sustainability of the proposed model and its integration into existing frameworks.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's dependence on appropriations by the Legislature, which may delay the implementation of the wildfire risk model. Another area of debate is related to the effectiveness of the proposed model in comprehensively addressing diverse local conditions. Stakeholders express concerns that the bill may not sufficiently account for the variations in wildfire risks across different geographical regions within the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB610

Fire prevention: wildfire mitigation area: defensible space: State Fire Marshal.

CA SB1060

Property insurance underwriting: risk models.

CA AB1933

Wildfire risk models.

CA AB2416

Residential property insurance: wildfire risk.

CA SB504

Wildfires: defensible space: grant programs: local governments.

CA SB867

Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024.

CA SB675

Prescribed grazing: local assistance grant program: Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force.

CA SB1088

Office of Emergency Services: state matching funds: water system infrastructure improvements.

CA SB470

Water: Urban Water Community Drought Relief program: Small Community Drought Relief program: high fire hazard and very high fire hazard severity zones.

CA AB2330

Endangered species: incidental take: wildfire preparedness activities.

Similar Bills

CA AB1516

Fire prevention: wildfire risk: defensible space and fuels reduction management.

CA AB1143

State Fire Marshal: home hardening certification program.

CA AB642

Wildfires.

CA SB292

Wildfire risk reporting.

CA SB190

Fire safety: building standards: defensible space program.