California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB326

Introduced
1/30/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/30/20  
Engrossed
1/30/20  
Refer
1/30/20  
Refer
1/30/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Report Pass
7/22/20  
Report Pass
7/22/20  
Refer
7/22/20  
Report Pass
8/5/20  
Report Pass
8/5/20  
Refer
8/6/20  
Refer
8/6/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  

Caption

Electric mobility manufacturers.

Impact

This legislation could significantly impact California's approach to electric mobility, ensuring that manufacturers comply with both state and federal regulations. It positions electric mobility manufacturers within the existing legal framework governing vehicle transactions, particularly concerning vehicle registration and consumer safety. The bill demands adherence to standards outlined in the California Consumer Privacy Act and the Consumer Automotive Recall Safety Act, thereby promoting transparency and consumer rights while engaging with electric mobility brands.

Summary

Assembly Bill 326, introduced by Assembly Member Muratsuchi, focuses on establishing regulations specific to electric mobility manufacturers. The bill allows these manufacturers to engage in transactions with consumers for the use of electric vehicles in exchange for a membership fee. It lays out requirements for membership agreements, which must include essential information regarding the terms of use for electric vehicles. Moreover, it mandates that manufacturers ensure that vehicles are registered and that necessary operating fees are paid before they can engage in transactions with consumers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 326 appears to be cautiously optimistic, as support primarily comes from stakeholders interested in advancing electric mobility and ensuring that consumer relations are handled appropriately. However, there might be concerns from traditional automotive sectors that fear the possible business disruptions or challenges this may present to established practices. Some stakeholders may question the implications on data privacy and consumer rights as manufacturers adapt to these changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include how this bill manages consumer data privacy and the limitations placed on manufacturers regarding liability for damages during consumer possession of a vehicle. While the bill seeks to limit liability exposure for consumers and protect their rights through mandated agreements, debates may arise around the enforcement of personal information protections and the steadfastness of the consumer’s rights within membership agreements. Measures within the bill to prohibit manufacturer disclosure of identifiable personal information may also see scrutiny as the balance between privacy and operational innovation is navigated.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1211

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA SB1445

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA AB2922

Economic development: capital investment incentive programs.

CA AB2873

Personal vehicle sharing: recalled vehicles.

CA AB904

Income taxes: credits: manufacturers’ machinery and equipment.

CA AB726

Capital investment incentive program: qualified manufacturing facility: ad valorem property tax revenue allocation payments.

CA AB1900

Capital investment incentive programs: repeal date.

VA HB2483

Digital Right to Repair Act; access to diagnostics, tools, service documentation, and firmware.