| 1 | 1 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 3319Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-SawyerFebruary 21, 2020 An act to add Section 829.7 to the Penal Code, relating to code enforcement officers. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 3319, as introduced, Jones-Sawyer. Code enforcement officers: safety standards.Existing law defines the term code enforcement officer as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified.This bill would require each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers to develop safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. By imposing new duties on local jurisdictions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 829.7 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 829.5, to read:829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction.SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. |
|---|
| 2 | 2 | | |
|---|
| 3 | 3 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 3319Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-SawyerFebruary 21, 2020 An act to add Section 829.7 to the Penal Code, relating to code enforcement officers. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 3319, as introduced, Jones-Sawyer. Code enforcement officers: safety standards.Existing law defines the term code enforcement officer as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified.This bill would require each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers to develop safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. By imposing new duties on local jurisdictions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES |
|---|
| 4 | 4 | | |
|---|
| 5 | 5 | | |
|---|
| 6 | 6 | | |
|---|
| 7 | 7 | | |
|---|
| 8 | 8 | | |
|---|
| 9 | 9 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION |
|---|
| 10 | 10 | | |
|---|
| 11 | 11 | | Assembly Bill |
|---|
| 12 | 12 | | |
|---|
| 13 | 13 | | No. 3319 |
|---|
| 14 | 14 | | |
|---|
| 15 | 15 | | Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-SawyerFebruary 21, 2020 |
|---|
| 16 | 16 | | |
|---|
| 17 | 17 | | Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer |
|---|
| 18 | 18 | | February 21, 2020 |
|---|
| 19 | 19 | | |
|---|
| 20 | 20 | | An act to add Section 829.7 to the Penal Code, relating to code enforcement officers. |
|---|
| 21 | 21 | | |
|---|
| 22 | 22 | | LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST |
|---|
| 23 | 23 | | |
|---|
| 24 | 24 | | ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST |
|---|
| 25 | 25 | | |
|---|
| 26 | 26 | | AB 3319, as introduced, Jones-Sawyer. Code enforcement officers: safety standards. |
|---|
| 27 | 27 | | |
|---|
| 28 | 28 | | Existing law defines the term code enforcement officer as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified.This bill would require each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers to develop safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. By imposing new duties on local jurisdictions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. |
|---|
| 29 | 29 | | |
|---|
| 30 | 30 | | Existing law defines the term code enforcement officer as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified. |
|---|
| 31 | 31 | | |
|---|
| 32 | 32 | | This bill would require each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers to develop safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. By imposing new duties on local jurisdictions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. |
|---|
| 33 | 33 | | |
|---|
| 34 | 34 | | The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. |
|---|
| 35 | 35 | | |
|---|
| 36 | 36 | | This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. |
|---|
| 37 | 37 | | |
|---|
| 38 | 38 | | ## Digest Key |
|---|
| 39 | 39 | | |
|---|
| 40 | 40 | | ## Bill Text |
|---|
| 41 | 41 | | |
|---|
| 42 | 42 | | The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 829.7 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 829.5, to read:829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction.SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. |
|---|
| 43 | 43 | | |
|---|
| 44 | 44 | | The people of the State of California do enact as follows: |
|---|
| 45 | 45 | | |
|---|
| 46 | 46 | | ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows: |
|---|
| 47 | 47 | | |
|---|
| 48 | 48 | | SECTION 1. Section 829.7 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 829.5, to read:829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 49 | 49 | | |
|---|
| 50 | 50 | | SECTION 1. Section 829.7 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 829.5, to read: |
|---|
| 51 | 51 | | |
|---|
| 52 | 52 | | ### SECTION 1. |
|---|
| 53 | 53 | | |
|---|
| 54 | 54 | | 829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 55 | 55 | | |
|---|
| 56 | 56 | | 829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 57 | 57 | | |
|---|
| 58 | 58 | | 829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations.(b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 59 | 59 | | |
|---|
| 60 | 60 | | |
|---|
| 61 | 61 | | |
|---|
| 62 | 62 | | 829.7. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that code enforcement officers are disproportionately at risk for threat, assault, injury, and even homicide due to the nature of their obligations. |
|---|
| 63 | 63 | | |
|---|
| 64 | 64 | | (b) Each local jurisdiction that employs code enforcement officers shall develop code enforcement officer safety standards appropriate for the code enforcement officers employed in their jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 65 | 65 | | |
|---|
| 66 | 66 | | SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. |
|---|
| 67 | 67 | | |
|---|
| 68 | 68 | | SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. |
|---|
| 69 | 69 | | |
|---|
| 70 | 70 | | SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. |
|---|
| 71 | 71 | | |
|---|
| 72 | 72 | | ### SEC. 2. |
|---|