California Assembly Bill AB3338

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/20

Caption

Community services districts: zones.

Impact

The most notable change introduced by AB 3338 is the clarification of the public hearing process for forming zones. In cases where more than 50 percent of voters or property owners express written objections, the board is required to terminate the formation proceedings. Conversely, if objections are less than 50 percent, the board has the discretion to proceed with the zone's formation. This ensures a level of accountability and responsiveness to local residents' concerns, reinforcing the democratic process within community services.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3338, introduced by Assembly Member Diep, seeks to amend Section 61141 of the Government Code pertaining to the formation of zones within community services districts. Under existing Community Services District Law, these districts are established to provide essential public facilities and services, allowing for more localized governance and the ability to tailor services to community needs. This bill reinforces the process for public hearings required prior to the formation of such zones, ensuring that protests regarding proposed zone formations are adequately considered by the board of directors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, AB 3338 is positioned to ensure that community governance remains sensitive to the concerns of its constituents while also balancing the need for operational efficiency. The amendments may encourage greater public engagement and scrutiny in the formation of community service zones, fostering a collaborative approach to local governance.

Contention

While the bill primarily makes nonsubstantive changes to existing law, any amendment concerning governance on a local level can lead to debates about autonomy and control. Those in favor argue that the bill streamlines processes and enhances responsiveness to community input, while critics may fear that such changes could impact the efficacy of local governance, particularly in areas where community needs vary significantly. Still, the bill's intent to solidify public participation is seen as a beneficial enhancement to the legislative landscape of community services.