California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB351

Introduced
2/4/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/7/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
5/8/19  

Caption

Payment options for criminal fines and fees.

Impact

The legislation recognizes the financial challenges faced by many individuals involved in the criminal justice system, particularly those who may struggle to pay their fines within the traditional timeline. By establishing a payment system, the bill could enhance the likelihood of compliance with court orders and reduce the number of defendants who fall into contempt due to inability to meet financial obligations. Courts will also have the authority to allow reductions in fines if autopayment options are utilized, incentivizing timely payments.

Summary

AB351, introduced by Assembly Member Choi, aims to amend the Penal Code by requiring courts to offer payment plans for criminal fines and fees. Under the legislation, any defendant facing fines, fees, penalties, or assessments exceeding $500 must be offered a payment plan, while options for defendants with amounts below this threshold may also be provided. Additionally, the bill mandates that defendants can pay via credit card, potentially easing the burden of upfront payments required for court-ordered fees associated with criminal proceedings.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB351 appears generally supportive among advocates for criminal justice reform and those focusing on socioeconomic disparities within the judicial system. Many view the bill as a progressive step towards creating a more equitable legal framework. Critics, however, may express concerns regarding the administrative burden associated with tracking payments and the potential for new fees imposed on defendants for processing payment plans.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provision for assessing contempt against defendants who fail to comply with payment plan agreements. This aspect of the bill raises concerns about further criminalizing poverty. Additionally, the fiscal implications on local courts, while stated that no reimbursement is required from the state, may still be a topic of discussion among legislative stakeholders who weigh the administrative costs of implementing this new system against the intended benefits of increased compliance and reduced penalties for non-payment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB67

Attorney General: Reproductive Privacy Act: enforcement.

CA AB764

Contempt of court: victim intimidation.

CA SB824

Criminal fees.

CA AB1869

Criminal fees.

CA SB144

Criminal fees.

CA AB3

Firearms: age restrictions.

CA SB757

Solar energy system improvements: consumer protection.

CA SB1040

Insurance: restitution.