California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB414

Introduced
2/7/19  
Introduced
2/7/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
7/5/19  
Refer
7/5/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
9/10/19  
Refer
9/10/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  
Passed
10/12/19  

Caption

Health care coverage: minimum essential coverage.

Impact

The implementation of AB 414 is likely to enhance transparency regarding health care coverage penalties and compliance outcomes in California. By requiring the Franchise Tax Board to report on households paying penalties and claiming exemptions, the bill seeks to provide legislative oversight of the MEC mandate's effectiveness. It will allow policymakers to evaluate how many residents are maintaining coverage and how the financial penalties are impacting low to middle-income families across various income brackets. Overall, it aims to ensure that the state's health coverage policies are being enforced and effectively managed.

Summary

Assembly Bill 414, introduced by Assemblymember Bonta, aims to enhance the reporting requirements concerning the Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) mandate as established under existing state and federal law. This law mandates that individuals maintain a level of health insurance known as minimum essential coverage. The bill requires the Franchise Tax Board to provide annual reports to the Legislature starting from March 1, 2022, detailing relevant statistics on households affected by the MEC mandate, including penalty amounts and exemptions claimed. The bill's goal is to ensure that comprehensive data is available for assessing the impact of the MEC on California residents.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 414 appears predominantly supportive among its proponents who believe that increased transparency in health care coverage reporting will help identify gaps in compliance and areas needing improvement. The need for reliable data on health coverage has become even more critical in light of changing federal policies regarding health care, and this bill represents an effort to maintain California's commitment to ensuring coverage for all residents. However, there may also be some concerns about the potential administrative burdens on the Franchise Tax Board and whether this reporting requirement will lead to meaningful changes in health care accessibility and affordability.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for AB 414 aimed at improving health care reporting, there may also be contention regarding the effectiveness of merely increasing reporting as a solution to the underlying issues of health care coverage. Critics may argue that without addressing systemic barriers to obtaining health insurance, such as costs and accessibility, merely tracking penalties and exemptions does not create tangible improvements in health outcomes. Additionally, the feasibility and resource implications of fulfilling the reporting requirements may be seen as burdensome for the Franchise Tax Board if not supported by sufficient funding and resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1434

Public social services: SSI/SSP.

CA AB3200

Public social services: SSI/SSP.

CA AB85

State taxes and charges.

CA SB114

State taxes and charges.

CA SB7

Regional housing need: determination.

CA AB375

Privacy: personal information: businesses.

CA AB796

Public social services: SSI/SSP.

CA AB83

Housing.