California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB425

Introduced
2/7/19  
Introduced
2/7/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  

Caption

Firearms: ammunition sales.

Impact

The primary impact of AB 425 on state laws is the amendment to existing regulations regarding who can purchase ammunition without going through licensed vendors. By including private security personnel and certain forensic laboratory employees as exempt from these regulations, the bill intends to streamline ammunition access for those directly involved in law enforcement and public safety. The bill also adjusts the requirements for written authorization from law enforcement agencies to facilitate the process for their personnel, thereby potentially increasing efficacy in operations requiring ammunition usage.

Summary

Assembly Bill 425, introduced by Assembly Member Cooley, seeks to amend existing laws related to the sale of ammunition in California, particularly provisions outlined in Proposition 63, which was originally enacted to ensure that ammunition sales are strictly regulated and conducted through licensed vendors. AB 425 aims to expand the list of exemptions from the requirement for ammunition sales to include additional personnel, such as licensed private patrol operators and employees of public forensic laboratories, facilitating their access to ammunition in the scope of their duties. This bill emphasizes the need for law enforcement and related agencies to access ammunition more efficiently, especially in fulfilling their operational responsibilities.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding AB 425 is mixed, with a clear divide between supporters, primarily including law enforcement and private security groups who argue that the bill enhances public safety and operational efficiency, and critics who express concern that it may undermine the strict regulations established by Proposition 63 aimed at controlling ammunition access. Opponents warn that increased exemptions could lead to greater risks of misuse or diversion of ammunition, undermining efforts to enhance public safety through strict regulations.

Contention

The main points of contention revolve around the balance between facilitating law enforcement operations and maintaining strict control over ammunition distribution. Critics of AB 425 argue that the expanded exemptions could weaken the protections put in place by Proposition 63. Supporters counter that the amendments are consistent with the intent of improving public safety by ensuring that those tasked with security and forensic responsibilities can access the materials needed for their roles without unnecessary bureaucratic hindrances.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2213

Firearms: ammunition sales.

CA AB1237

Information access: research institutions: firearms.

CA AB173

Public Safety.

CA SB173

Budget Act of 2022.

CA AB879

Firearms.

CA AB2382

Firearms: firearm precursor parts.

CA SB704

Firearms: firearm barrels.

CA AB693

Firearms.