California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB435

Introduced
2/11/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

High-speed rail bonds: water.

Impact

The proposed changes in AB 435 would have significant implications for California's transportation policy and educational governance. By limiting the scope of high-speed rail funding, the bill could slow down momentum for rail improvements anticipated under earlier funding measures, while simultaneously addressing pressing water infrastructure challenges. Such measures may necessitate adjustments in how funds are allocated and could impact ongoing projects that rely on the previous bond authorizations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 435, introduced by Assembly Member Fong, addresses modifications related to high-speed rail funding and the California State Board of Education. Specifically, the bill seeks to halt further issuance of bonds for high-speed rail under the California High-Speed Rail Act, limiting future appropriations to existing projects and redirecting unspent bond proceeds towards retiring existing debts. The bill allocates any net proceeds from future bond sales to water infrastructure projects in the Central Valley, reflecting a shift in focus from transportation to water resource management.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding AB 435 have been mixed, reflecting a divide between proponents of high-speed rail and advocates for increased water infrastructure investment. Supporters of the bill argue that redirecting funds to water projects is crucial given current drought conditions in the Central Valley, while critics express concerns about the potential undermining of high-speed rail as a transformative transportation initiative within California.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the priorities in state funding. Advocates for high-speed rail emphasize the long-term economic benefits and connectivity that a robust rail system would provide, arguing that halting bond issuance could stifle future growth and innovation in transportation. On the other hand, proponents of the redirection emphasize urgent water resource needs, suggesting that abandoning high-speed rail funding could be necessary to secure water infrastructure improvements essential for population health and agricultural productivity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1442

Bonds: transportation: water projects.

CA SB414

Transportation bonds: highway, street, and road projects.

CA AB2712

Bonds: Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century.

CA AB553

High-speed rail bonds: housing.

CA AB2530

Bonds: transportation.

CA SB340

High-speed rail bonds.

CA SB551

Capital Access Loan Program for Small Businesses.

CA AB1825

Education finance: constitutional minimum funding obligation: local control funding formula.