California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB441

Introduced
2/11/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  

Caption

Water: underground storage.

Impact

The proposed amendment has significant implications for state water laws, particularly regarding water rights. By redefining beneficial use to include certain activities while the water is stored underground, the bill seeks to ensure that periods during which water is stored underground do not count against the forfeiture periods of water rights. This is intended to protect users from losing their water rights if they are engaged in storing water for future beneficial purposes, encouraging better water conservation measures.

Summary

Assembly Bill 441, introduced by Assembly Member Eggman, aims to amend Section 1242 of the California Water Code relating to underground water storage. The bill redefines beneficial use of water to include the diversion of water into underground storage for purposes such as groundwater recharge. It posits that any water diverted for underground storage will be considered beneficial use provided that it is applied to beneficial purposes later. This inclusion aims to clarify and broaden the understanding of beneficial use regarding water storage, thereby facilitating more efficient water management practices.

Sentiment

Support for AB 441 primarily comes from those advocating for improved water management strategies in California, particularly in light of ongoing drought issues. Proponents argue that the bill will help streamline water storage processes and enhance groundwater recharge efforts. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the broader implications of amending water rights regulations, which reflects a polarized sentiment—supporters see it as a progressive step toward sustainability, while detractors warn of potential misuse or unintended consequences.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concern that the bill may undermine existing water rights principles and lead to complications in water management. Critics argue that while the intent is to promote efficient use of stored water, there could be excessive diversions if not properly regulated. They emphasize the need for safeguards to ensure that the bill does not lead to a depletion of local groundwater resources, highlighting the balance between beneficial use and sustainable water management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1427

Water: underground storage.

CA AB2649

State Water Project: water supply contracts.

CA SB762

Groundwater storage: beneficial use.

CA AB658

Water rights: water management.

NV AB387

Revises provisions relating to water. (BDR 48-338)

NV AB9

Revises provisions relating to water. (BDR 48-391)

CA AB2447

Oil and gas wastewater: unlined ponds: prohibition.

WY SF0080

Abandonment of water rights-limitations.