California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB455 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly March 12, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 455Introduced by Assembly Member KileyFebruary 11, 2019 An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law. ex parte orders.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 455, as amended, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices devices, in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. necessary to implement these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this the bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 455Introduced by Assembly Member KileyFebruary 11, 2019 An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 455, as introduced, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly March 12, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 455Introduced by Assembly Member KileyFebruary 11, 2019 An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law. ex parte orders.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 455, as amended, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices devices, in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. necessary to implement these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this the bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 455Introduced by Assembly Member KileyFebruary 11, 2019 An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 455, as introduced, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
44
5- Amended IN Assembly March 12, 2019
65
7-Amended IN Assembly March 12, 2019
6+
7+
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill No. 455
1212
1313 Introduced by Assembly Member KileyFebruary 11, 2019
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member Kiley
1616 February 11, 2019
1717
18- An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law. ex parte orders.
18+ An act to amend Section 6320 of the Family Code, relating to family law.
1919
2020 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2121
2222 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
24-AB 455, as amended, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.
24+AB 455, as introduced, Kiley. Ex parte orders: connected devices.
2525
26-Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices devices, in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. necessary to implement these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this the bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
26+Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
2727
2828 Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts against another party, including threatening or harassing that party, and, in the discretion of the court, against other named family or household members. A violation of this court order constitutes contempt of court, which is punishable as a misdemeanor.
2929
30-This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices devices, in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. necessary to implement these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this the bill would impose a state-mandated program.
30+This bill would additionally authorize a court to issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of the other party. The bill would require the Judicial Council to update existing forms to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner and to develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated program.
3131
3232 The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
3333
3434 This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
3535
3636 ## Digest Key
3737
3838 ## Bill Text
3939
40-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
40+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
4141
4242 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4343
4444 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4545
46-SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
46+SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.
4747
4848 SECTION 1. Section 6320 of the Family Code is amended to read:
4949
5050 ### SECTION 1.
5151
52-6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
52+6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.
5353
54-6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
54+6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.
5555
56-6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2)The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d)For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
56+6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.(b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.(2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.(d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.
5757
5858
5959
60-6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, disturbing the peace of, or remotely controlling any connected devices devices, as defined in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code, in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.
60+6320. (a) The court may issue an ex parte order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in Section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of of, or remotely controlling any connected devices in the home of, the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members.
6161
6262 (b) On a showing of good cause, the court may include in a protective order a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent. The court may order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.
6363
64-(c)(1)The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.
64+(c)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2014.
6565
6666
6767
68+(c) (1) The Judicial Council shall update its existing forms, Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Temporary Restraining Order to include a check box for the petitioner to request the court to include in its order a prohibition on remotely controlling all known and unknown connected devices in the home of the petitioner.
69+
6870 (2) The Judicial Council shall develop or update any other forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
6971
70-
71-
7272 (d) For the purposes of this section, connected device has the same meaning as in Section 1798.91.05 of the Civil Code.
73-
74-
75-
76-(c) The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2021, develop or update any forms or rules of court that are necessary to implement this section.
7773
7874 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
7975
8076 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
8177
8278 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
8379
8480 ### SEC. 2.