California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB496

Introduced
2/12/19  
Introduced
2/12/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
6/10/19  
Report Pass
6/10/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
9/27/19  
Chaptered
9/27/19  
Passed
9/27/19  

Caption

Business and professions.

Impact

The most significant implications of AB 496 involve changes to the governance structures of licensing boards, allowing for a more direct and unequivocal process for the removal of board members. By shifting the power to appoint and remove members to the appointing authority, the bill could impact how these boards operate and enforce regulations across various professions. Additionally, the updates in terminology aim to reflect contemporary understandings of gender, thus promoting inclusivity within professional legislation.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 496, primarily focused on the governance of professional licensing boards under the Department of Consumer Affairs, aims to streamline administrative processes and modernize terminology within the Business and Professions Code. By replacing the term 'licentiate' with 'licensee,' the bill enhances clarity and consistency in the law. The bill also grants appointing authorities the power to remove board members for incompetence and modifies reporting requirements for the Director of Consumer Affairs to enhance oversight and accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 496 appears generally supportive among legislators and advocates for regulatory efficiency and clarity. The consensus suggests that improvements in the governance of licensing boards and updates to language within the statute are necessary for reflecting societal changes. However, there may be underlying concerns about the extent of power transferred to appointing authorities, with critics arguing that such changes could lead to potential abuses of power in board governance.

Contention

Notably, while there is broad agreement on improving the clarity and efficiency of regulatory processes, the bill does spark some contention regarding the balance of authority. Some stakeholders express concerns that transferring the ability to remove board members from the governor to the appointing authority could lead to politicization and influence in professional governance. The changes may pave the way for administrative simplifications but also necessitate rigorous oversight to safeguard against the misuse of power.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2457

Podiatry: Podiatric Medical Board of California.

CA SB826

Business and professions.

CA SB1483

Department of Consumer Affairs: Bureau of Household Goods and Services: electronic and appliance repair, home furnishings, and thermal insulation.

CA AB3184

California State Board of Optometry.

CA SB1474

Business and professions.

CA AB3110

Athletic trainers.

CA AB1665

Athletic trainers.

CA AB1592

Athletic trainers.