California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB532

Introduced
2/13/19  
Introduced
2/13/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
3/11/19  
Report Pass
3/11/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

California State University Parking Fairness Act.

Impact

The bill is significant as it seeks to alter the existing financial dynamics within California State Universities (CSU), ensuring that students are not subsidizing parking costs for employees. The implementation of this bill is intended by the 2022-2023 academic year, reflecting the urgency of making education more affordable. By potentially reducing parking expenses for students, this legislation may help alleviate some of the monetary burdens they experience, especially given that a notable percentage of CSU students face issues like chronic hunger and homelessness.

Summary

Assembly Bill 532, known as the California State University Parking Fairness Act, was introduced by Assembly Member Weber to address the disparities in parking permit costs between students and campus affiliates. The bill mandates that student parking permits should be priced lower than those for campus employees for the same time and locations. This legislation arises from an acknowledgment of the financial strains faced by students, where many struggle to afford basic living costs while pursuing their education, including parking fees that are currently disproportionately higher than those of campus staff and faculty.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 532 is largely supportive among student advocates and educational policymakers who believe that such measures are necessary to uplift student welfare. However, there may be some concerns regarding how this change will affect campus revenue streams associated with parking fees and whether it will lead to increases in costs elsewhere, such as for employee permits or other university services.

Contention

Despite its support, the bill may face contention regarding implementation logistics and funding implications. Critics may question how campuses would adapt to lower parking revenue and what strategies would be put in place to manage potential shortfalls. Additionally, addressing the balance between employee parking needs and student affordability will be a point of discussion among stakeholders, indicating the complexity of higher education funding in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1038

Postsecondary education: higher education policy.

CA AB2080

University of California: schools of medicine: report.

CA AB2132

California Medical School Tuition for Medical Service Pilot Program.

CA AB1256

Transactions and use taxes: County of Humboldt.

CA SB1325

California Techquity Innovation Program.

CA SB770

California Community Colleges: pathways to law school programs.

CA AB1918

California Reproductive Health Service Corps.

CA AB1364

Public postsecondary education: Higher Education Funding Formula.