California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB563

Introduced
2/13/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Mental health: funding.

Impact

The introduction of AB 563 represents a significant shift in the state’s approach to mental health crises. By allocating funds directly for mental health interventions, the bill reflects an understanding of the urgent need for better mental health resources in communities. The proposed pilot program includes an emphasis on reporting and evaluation, requiring the task force to provide insights on the effectiveness of the services offered, which should inform future policy decisions and funding allocations. The bill is expected to set a precedent for similar funding initiatives aimed at addressing mental health statewide.

Summary

Assembly Bill 563, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, seeks to enhance mental health services through a robust funding initiative. The bill appropriates a total of $16 million from the General Fund, which will be allocated to the North Orange County Public Safety Task Force. This funding aims to establish a two-year pilot program focusing on providing various mental health services to assist individuals and families in crisis. Specifically, the program will ensure access to critical resources like a 24-hour crisis line, mobile crisis response units, and a 211 social services support system.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 563 appears to be positive, with numerous stakeholders advocating for increased support for mental health initiatives. Proponents argue that the funding will lead to improved outcomes for individuals experiencing mental health crises by ensuring timely and accessible services. However, there may also be concerns regarding the implementation of such programs and whether they will adequately meet the diverse needs of the community. Overall, the bill indicates a commitment to prioritizing mental health in state policy.

Contention

While AB 563 has garnered support, notable contentions may arise related to the distribution and management of the allocated funds. Concerns about bureaucratic inefficiencies or potential mismanagement of resources could detract from the bill's intended outcomes. Additionally, stakeholders might debate the effectiveness of the pilot program's design—specifically how data will be collected and utilized in the evaluation phase of the initiative. Clear guidelines and accountability measures will be essential to ensure that the funding translates into meaningful and positive impacts for the constituents it aims to serve.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1532

Public Utilities Commission.

CA SB86

Crime victims: resource center.

CA AB413

Foster youth: housing.

CA AB1468

Opioid Prevention and Rehabilitation Act.

CA AB242

Public utilities.

CA SB255

Women, minority, disabled veteran, and LGBT business enterprise procurement: electric service providers: energy storage system companies: community choice aggregators.

CA SB1069

Telecommunications: emergencies and natural disasters: critical communications infrastructure.

CA AB988

Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act: veteran and military data reporting.