California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB580

Introduced
2/14/19  
Introduced
2/14/19  
Refer
2/25/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/2/19  

Caption

Commutations of sentence.

Impact

The bill seeks to enhance victim involvement and notification within the commutation process, thereby addressing criticisms of previous legislation that may have inadequately protected victims' rights. It requires that the Governor confirm that the victims' families have been notified prior to any commutation decision, thus formalizing the role of victim impact in parole and commutation matters. The bill also repeals certain outdated provisions and clarifies the requirements for annual reporting on pardons, reprieves, and commutations to the legislature.

Summary

Assembly Bill 580, introduced by Assembly Member Lackey, aims to amend the process surrounding commutations of sentences within California. Specifically, it establishes a 30-day notice requirement before the Governor can act on applications for commutations of death sentences, expanding the previous 10-day notice period. This change emphasizes timely communication with the relevant district attorney, as well as the victim's family. Furthermore, the bill allows victims' family members to request a public hearing regarding any proposed commutation of a death sentence, thus ensuring their voices are heard in the decision-making process.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB 580 appears to be favorable among those advocating for victims' rights and transparency in the justice system. Proponents believe that these amendments are necessary steps towards recognizing the emotional and psychological impact that commutations can have on victims and their families. Conversely, opponents may view the increased restrictions and requirements as unnecessary hurdles, potentially complicating the commutation process for deserving cases. Therefore, the overall sentiment reflects a significant concern for victims as well as a push for a more structured process.

Contention

Notable contention point arises from the additional administrative requirements imposed on the Governor and the Board of Parole Hearings. Critics may argue that requiring a public hearing and extending notification periods could delay justice for individuals seeking commutation who may have demonstrated rehabilitation qualities. This aspect introduces a debate between ensuring victim rights and allowing a fair and efficient process for those convicted of crimes who request clemency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB378

Public officials.

CA SB2

Peace officers: certification: civil rights.

CA SB451

Gambling Control Act: investigations.

CA SB832

Sexually violent predators.

CA AB452

Courts.

CA SB321

Compensation for wrongful conviction: hearings by a special master.

CA SB449

Peace officers: Peace Officer Standards Accountability Advisory Board.

CA AB703

Public postsecondary education: fee waivers for exonerated persons.