California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB622

Introduced
2/15/19  
Introduced
2/15/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Engrossed
4/4/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
6/4/19  
Enrolled
6/18/19  
Enrolled
6/18/19  
Chaptered
6/26/19  
Chaptered
6/26/19  
Passed
6/26/19  

Caption

Service of process or subpoena.

Impact

The enactment of AB 622 potentially improves the efficiency of legal processes by ensuring that process servers and authorized individuals can perform their duties without obstruction in both gated and multifamily residential areas. By allowing access to a wider range of residential properties, the bill aims to facilitate quicker legal proceedings, ensuring that individuals receiving documents are not hindered by physical barriers in properties that may be prone to restricted access due to security measures.

Summary

Assembly Bill 622, introduced by Chen, amends Section 415.21 of the Code of Civil Procedure in California, specifically addressing the rules surrounding service of process or subpoenas in gated communities and covered multifamily dwellings. Prior to this amendment, existing law already permitted individuals to access gated communities for the purpose of serving legal documents, but this bill expands those provisions to include 'covered multifamily dwellings.' These are defined as residential buildings containing multiple dwelling units, such as apartments and condominiums, thereby broadening the scope of access granted to those serving legal notices.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 622 appears to be supportive, primarily from those within the legal community, including process servers and law enforcement representatives, who view this clarification of access rights as a positive step in making the legal process more straightforward. However, concerns may arise from residential communities regarding privacy and security implications, as increased access for process servers could raise fears of undue intrusions. Discussions in legislative committee meetings reflect a blend of both support for enhancing legal processes and caution towards protecting residents' rights.

Contention

While support for AB 622 is centered on improving access for legal documentation delivery, there may be contention around potential misuse of this access by individuals outside of legitimate legal processes. The presence of security personnel is mandated during attempts to serve legal documents, which may mitigate concerns over misuse but still raises discussions about the balance between legal obligations and personal privacy in gated and multifamily living environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB561

Civil actions: service of process.

CA AB522

State departments: investigations and hearings: administrative subpoenas.

CA AB1194

California Privacy Rights Act of 2020: exemptions: abortion services.

CA SB345

Health care services: legally protected health care activities.

CA SB1451

Professions and vocations.

CA AB138

Human services.

CA SB138

Human services.

CA SB684

Land use: streamlined approval processes: development projects of 10 or fewer residential units on urban lots under 5 acres.

CA SB42

Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program: process and proceedings.

CA AB2067

Financial institutions: service of process.

Similar Bills

MT SB336

Revise laws related to short-term rentals

CA SB346

Local agencies: transient occupancy taxes: short-term rental facilitator.

FL H1399

Public Lodging and Public Food Service Establishments

FL H1257

Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes

AZ SB1489

Subdivisions; definition; lots

KY SB234

AN ACT relating to short-term rentals.

NV AB478

Revises provisions governing construction times in counties and cities. (BDR 20-1091)

AZ HB2410

Condominiums; planned communities; directors' duties