California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB709

Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/12/19  
Report Pass
4/12/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
10/2/19  
Chaptered
10/2/19  
Passed
10/2/19  

Caption

School districts: governing boards: pupil members.

Impact

The bill has a significant impact on how school districts operate by formalizing the inclusion of student voices in decision-making processes. By stipulating that pupil members have a rightful place in subcommittees and must be made aware of their time commitments, the bill aims to empower students and ensure that their perspectives are considered in discussions affecting their education. Furthermore, it introduces the possibility of awarding elective course credit to pupil members based on their participation, which can encourage more students to engage actively.

Summary

Assembly Bill 709, introduced by Assemblymember Bonta, focuses on enhancing the role of pupil members within school district governing boards in California. The bill mandates that school districts appoint one or more pupil members if a petition is submitted by the students. It allows these pupil members to participate in subcommittees, attend all relevant meetings, and receive all materials distributed to members, thus increasing student representation and involvement in educational governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 709 appears supportive overall, particularly among educational advocates who see the value in promoting student engagement and representation. However, some concerns may arise regarding the additional responsibilities placed on school districts to accommodate these changes, including potential financial impacts associated with providing course credits and managing pupil member duties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the administrative burden this bill may impose on school districts, particularly smaller districts that might struggle to accommodate additional governance responsibilities. Moreover, there is the challenge of ensuring that pupil members are adequately prepared for their roles, which could require additional training or support. Opponents might contend that while student representation is vital, the focus should also be on equipping these students with the necessary tools and information to be effective participants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB824

Local educational agencies: county boards of education: governing boards of school districts: governing bodies of charter schools: pupil members.

CA SB1236

School districts: governing boards: pupil members.

CA AB275

School governance: governing boards: pupil members: compensation.

CA SB1445

Governing boards: pupil members: expulsion hearing recommendations.

CA AB417

County boards of education: pupil members.