California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB748

Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/13/19  
Report Pass
6/13/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Chaptered
10/9/19  
Chaptered
10/9/19  
Passed
10/9/19  

Caption

Nonminor dependents.

Impact

The implications of AB748 are significant, as it challenges the established norms of local control over regulations. It aims to clarify which areas local governments can legislate on, particularly in areas like business and environmental regulations. The intent behind the bill is to reduce the possibility of conflicting regulations that might arise at the local level, which supporters believe could promote economic growth and provide a more predictable regulatory framework for businesses. However, the discussions surrounding the bill indicate a divisive opinion regarding its potential impact on communities.

Summary

AB748 aims to address the growing concerns around the regulatory powers of local governments in the state. The bill seeks to define and potentially limit the scope of regulations that can be enacted by local authorities, particularly in areas that intersect with state laws. Proponents argue that this will create a more streamlined regulatory environment, enabling consistency across jurisdictions and facilitating easier compliance for businesses operating within the state. This aligns with ongoing discussions regarding the balance of power between state and local governance.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment around AB748 appears to be polarized. Supporters from the business community and certain political factions view the bill positively, citing the need for uniformity and reduced regulatory burdens. Conversely, opponents, including various advocacy groups and some local government representatives, express concern that it undermines local governance and autonomy. They argue that local communities are better equipped to address their unique challenges and that the bill could stifle local innovation and responsiveness.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB748 include concerns over the potential stripping of local powers and the implications of centralizing regulatory authority at the state level. Critics argue that local regulations are essential for addressing specific community needs, particularly in sensitive areas like health and safety. The bill's sponsors, however, emphasize that the changes are necessary for fostering a business-friendly environment that could lead to broader economic benefits across the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB549

Nonminor dependents.

CA SB912

California Fostering Connections to Success Act.

CA AB2337

Nonminor dependents.

CA AB2309

Guardianships.

CA SB552

Juveniles: wards: case plans.

CA AB2124

Guardianships.

CA AB1154

Juveniles: mentoring programs.

CA AB260

Guardianships.