Resource families: training.
The amendments introduced by AB 865 create new obligations for counties in overseeing the training of resource families. By enhancing the training regimen to incorporate sensitive topics related to commercial sexual exploitation, this legislation aims to improve care for vulnerable children in the foster system. Local agencies will be mandated to design and deliver this training as part of their initial caregiver preparations, thereby influencing how resource families are prepared to offer care. The impact on state law is significant as it emphasizes the trauma-informed approach necessary for caretakers looking after at-risk youth.
Assembly Bill 865, also known as the Resource Families Training bill, aims to amend the Welfare and Institutions Code concerning the training requirements for resource families in California. The bill seeks to enhance the existing resource family approval process by mandating additional training for caregivers, particularly focusing on the needs of children who have experienced commercial sexual exploitation. Beginning January 1, 2021, counties will be required to include this specialized information in the preapproval training for all resource family applicants. Each resource family caring for children aged 10 and older will also need to undergo specific training within 12 months of their approval.
General sentiment towards AB 865 appears positive among stakeholders involved in child welfare, particularly those concerned with better equipping resource families to support children facing complex challenges. Advocates applaud the bill for recognizing the need for specialized training and the inclusion of contemporary issues related to child welfare in caregiver training. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of support and resources that counties will require to implement these training requirements effectively.
Despite the largely supportive sentiment, the contention lies in the implementation challenges this bill might present to counties, especially in terms of funding and resources. Critics worry that without sufficient state financial support, counties may struggle to provide the necessary training, potentially undermining the bill's objectives. Moreover, the lack of reimbursement provisions for the mandated training raises questions about the sustainability of these changes, leading to discussions about ensuring local agencies are appropriately funded to carry out their new responsibilities effectively.