California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB869

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Vetoed
10/8/19  

Caption

Surplus state property.

Impact

By necessitating a swift review of reported excess land within 150 days, AB 869 aims to improve efficiency in managing state assets. This new timeline could lead to more timely releases of properties that are no longer needed by state agencies, potentially increasing the availability of land for sale or development. Moreover, the obligation for annual reporting on excess properties enhances transparency in how state-owned lands are managed and disposed of, promoting accountability within state agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 869, introduced by Assembly Member Cunningham, amends Section 11011 of the Government Code in California regarding the management and disposition of surplus state property. The bill establishes a framework for state agencies to review their proprietary lands and report any excess properties to the Department of General Services (DGS). Significantly, it mandates that the DGS must determine within a specified timeframe if excess land is needed by any other state agency, thereby streamlining the process of identifying and managing surplus state properties.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 869 appears to be supportive, as it addresses ongoing concerns about the efficient use and management of state resources. Stakeholders recognize the need for a systematic approach to handling surplus properties, particularly given the potential for these lands to contribute to economic activity when repurposed or sold. However, some caution may arise regarding the speed of disposals and ensuring that valuable state properties are not sold hastily without proper evaluation of their potential uses.

Contention

While there is generally positive sentiment towards AB 869, notable points of contention could arise around the specific exemptions from environmental reviews in the disposition process, which may concern environmental advocates. Furthermore, ensuring that the determination by DGS does not overlook local needs or interests could also be a topic of debate, emphasizing the balancing act between state interests and community needs in the management of surplus properties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1336

Department of General Services: state property: Metropolitan State Hospital.

CA AB3288

State government: excess state property: Department of Veterans Affairs.

CA SB1317

Surplus state property.

CA AB1420

Surplus land.

CA AB1824

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption for closure of railroad grade crossing.

CA AB1486

Surplus land.

CA AB127

State government.

CA SB127

State government.