California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB875

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
7/2/20  
Refer
7/2/20  

Caption

Pupil support services: COVID-19 Support Services and Resiliency for Children Program.

Impact

The legislation highlights the urgent need for structured support systems, especially for vulnerable populations such as low-income families and communities disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Key provisions include directing funds to programs that mitigate learning loss due to school closures, and addressing mental health issues that have arisen during this period. By providing a framework for collaboration among local agencies, schools, and health services, AB 875 aims to create a more cohesive and effective response to the ongoing challenges faced by students.

Summary

AB 875, introduced by Assembly Member Wicks, addresses significant issues in pupil health by establishing the COVID-19 Support Services and Resiliency for Children Program. This bill is part of a broader effort to provide critical support services to students and their families during the pandemic, specifically focusing on health, mental health, social services, and academic support. It mandates the awarding of grants to educational agencies to facilitate the delivery of these services, emphasizing the need for comprehensive care amid the challenges posed by the COVID-19 crisis.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 875 appears positive among proponents who view it as a necessary intervention to support the educational and emotional well-being of children during a time of crisis. However, there may be concerns regarding the actual implementation of the program, especially surrounding the availability of funding and ensuring that grants are effectively utilized. This reflects a recognition of the complexity of barriers faced by children and families in crisis, which might complicate the bill's goals.

Contention

Despite the bill's supportive framework, notable contention exists regarding the sufficiency of funds and the prioritization of grants. Critics may argue that while the intent behind the legislation is commendable, the reliance on local matching funds and specific eligibility criteria could limit access for some schools and communities. Furthermore, ensuring that programs genuinely meet the needs of the children they serve raises challenges in terms of oversight and accountability. This underscores the ongoing need for engagement and adaptation within the education and health sectors as the state navigates the impacts of COVID-19.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1117

Pupil support services: Healthy Start: Toxic Stress and Trauma Resiliency for Children Program.

CA AB413

Education: at-promise youth.

CA SB75

Education finance: education omnibus budget trailer bill.

CA AB563

Childcare: Early Childhood Policy Council.

CA SB842

Education finance: education omnibus trailer bill.

CA AB1808

Education finance: education omnibus trailer bill.

CA AB75

Budget Act of 2019: augmentation.

CA SB185

Education finance: education omnibus trailer bill.