California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB923

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Enrolled
9/3/19  
Enrolled
9/3/19  
Chaptered
9/20/19  
Passed
9/20/19  

Caption

Bay Area Rapid Transit District: electricity procurement and delivery.

Impact

The bill's modifications are expected to have substantial implications for BART's operations and for the state's energy landscape. By allowing BART to obtain electricity from a wider array of sources, including through markets operated by the Independent System Operator, it positions the transit authority to potentially secure more favorable rates and diversify its energy supply. Local electric utilities and other stakeholders may respond to BART's expanded procurement power as it could encourage competition among electricity suppliers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 923, introduced by Assemblymember Wicks, amends Section 701.8 of the Public Utilities Code specifically in relation to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART). This legislation enhances BART's ability to procure electricity from various sources, including federal marketing agencies, local publicly-owned utilities, and renewable energy. By expanding BART's options for electricity procurement, the bill aims to help mitigate operational costs which are significantly driven by electricity expenses. Importantly, the bill emphasizes a commitment to sustainable energy practices, aligning with California's climate policy goals.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 923 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents who advocate for enhanced public transportation and sustainability. Supporters believe the bill facilitates the transition towards greener operations while ensuring that BART remains a cost-effective and reliable transit option for the public. However, there may also be caution from traditional utilities regarding the implications for their operations and pricing structures.

Contention

One underlying contention with the bill was the concern from conventional utility providers about BART's increased power. Critics argue that enabling the BART District to navigate its own electricity challenges may undermine existing regulatory frameworks and affect the stability of local service areas. Additionally, there were discussions about the extent to which BART should be allowed to operate without becoming a retail energy seller, a point clarified in the bill's intent to focus solely on operating the BART system without entering into retail energy markets.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1158

Retail electricity suppliers: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA AB79

Electrical generation: hourly greenhouse gas emissions: electricity from unspecified sources.

CA AB2898

California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.

CA AB242

Public utilities.