California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB928

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Child sexual exploitation: administrative subpoenas.

Impact

Should the bill be enacted, it would significantly alter the legal framework surrounding the access to and privacy of electronic communication information as it relates to investigations of child exploitation. By enabling the use of administrative subpoenas in this context, the bill essentially provides law enforcement greater access to subscriber information without needing a search warrant. Proponents argue that this will streamline investigations and could lead to faster resolutions in cases of online child exploitation. Opponents, however, might raise concerns about the potential erosion of privacy protections previously established by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

Summary

AB928, introduced by Assembly Member Grayson, addresses the challenges in investigating crimes against children, particularly those related to internet exploitation. The bill aims to amend the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by allowing peace officers conducting investigations of child sexual exploitation to issue administrative subpoenas to internet service providers for specific account information. This legislative change is proposed to enhance law enforcement's ability to respond swiftly to crimes involving minors and to facilitate the collection of relevant electronic evidence more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB928 is mixed. Supporters, including various law enforcement agencies and child advocacy groups, view it as a necessary tool to enhance the state's ability to protect children from online predators and to combat the growing threat of internet-based crimes. Conversely, privacy advocates express caution, emphasizing the risks of overreach and the potential negative implications for personal privacy rights under the amended law. This debate reflects broader societal concerns about balancing child protection initiatives with individual rights to privacy.

Contention

Notably, points of contention include the bill's implications for existing privacy laws and the degree to which it may allow for broader access to personal data. Critics highlight the possibility of misuse of this new power by law enforcement, stressing the need for safeguards to prevent abuse. The administrative subpoena process, while aimed at expediting investigations, may also inadvertently lead to the compromise of innocent citizens' data privacy. The discussions surrounding AB928 thus underscore the ongoing tension between the necessity of effective law enforcement and the preservation of civil liberties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB358

Criminal procedure: privacy.

CA AB608

Medical assistants.

CA AB165

Privacy: electronic communications: exclusions: local educational agencies.

CA AB904

Search warrants: tracking devices.

OK SB852

Electronic information privacy; creating Electronic Communication and Device Privacy Act. Effective date.

OK SB35

Electronic communication; creating the Electronic Communication and Device Privacy Act; establishing procedures for access to certain information. Effective date.

OK SB35

Electronic communication; creating the Electronic Communication and Device Privacy Act; establishing procedures for access to certain information. Effective date.

CA AB1027

Social media platforms: drug safety policies.