California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB953

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/30/20  
Engrossed
1/30/20  
Refer
1/30/20  
Refer
1/30/20  
Refer
6/23/20  

Caption

Land use: accessory dwelling units.

Impact

The enactment of AB 953 will have a significant impact on how local governments manage cannabis taxation and housing regulations. By permitting stablecoin payments, it could modernize and simplify the payment process for cannabis businesses. Additionally, the automatic approval process for ADUs aims to alleviate housing shortages by encouraging the development of additional housing units, particularly in areas with existing single-family or multifamily residences.

Summary

Assembly Bill 953, introduced by Assembly Members Ting and McCarty Bloom, addresses two main areas: the taxation of cannabis businesses and the creation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The bill permits local agencies to accept stablecoin payments from cannabis licensees for city or county cannabis taxes. Furthermore, it stipulates that if a local agency does not approve or deny a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit within 60 days, the application is automatically deemed approved, thereby streamlining the approval process for ADUs.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 953 appears to be generally supportive among proponents who see the bill as a progressive step towards modernizing tax collection methods and addressing housing shortages. Critics may be concerned about the implications of integrating digital asset payments into local taxation and the potential for overreach in state-mandated housing regulations that could disrupt local planning authority.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from local governments regarding their ability to manage land use in the wake of standardized state regulations for ADUs and the complexities introduced by accepting digital asset payments. Opponents may argue that this could undermine local control over zoning and taxation and potentially lead to complications in managing tax revenue from cannabis sales.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB916

Zoning: bedroom addition.

CA SB773

Emergencies: State 911 Advisory Board.

CA SB13

Accessory dwelling units.

CA AB881

Accessory dwelling units.

CA AB68

Land use: accessory dwelling units.

CA AB1442

Accessory dwelling units.

CA AB1135

State of California Housing Allocation Act.

CA AB2603

Accessory dwelling units.