The introduction of AB966 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws surrounding greenhouse gas emissions and environmental accountability in the cement industry. By requiring product-specific EPDs for cement used in public contracts, the bill aligns with the objectives of the Buy Clean California Act, ensuring that public construction projects utilize materials that meet specific environmental standards. This could also encourage more cement plants to adopt sustainable practices and invest in cleaner technologies.
AB966 is a legislative measure introduced by Assembly Member Bonta aimed at cement plants operating within California. The bill mandates that by January 1, 2022, each cement plant must prepare and submit a facility-specific Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), in accordance with the ISO standard 14025, to the State Air Resources Board. This requirement is designed to enhance transparency regarding the environmental impacts of cement production and reduce greenhouse gas emissions as part of the state's broader climate goals established under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
Overall sentiment towards AB966 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates who see it as a necessary step towards reducing emissions from one of the most carbon-intensive industries. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders about the potential costs associated with compliance and the administrative burden of generating EPDs. The balance between environmental responsibility and economic feasibility remains a crucial point of discussion among legislators and industry representatives.
One notable point of contention surrounding AB966 could involve the requirements imposed on smaller cement plants that may struggle to meet the rigorous standards for EPDs, as those producing less than 25,000 cubic yards annually are exempt from some provisions of the bill. This exemption raises questions about fairness and competitiveness within the industry, as larger players may more easily absorb the compliance costs. Additionally, ensuring that third-party certifications of EPDs are reliable and transparent will be critical in maintaining stakeholder trust.