Medi-Cal: Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
AB 977 has a significant impact on state laws related to health care services for children enrolled in Medi-Cal. It emphasizes the need for a structured review and accountability mechanism by requiring the department to develop and publish findings based on the review of the auditor's report. By securing timely access to EPSDT services, the bill aims to ensure that healthcare delivery aligns with federal Medicaid regulations while addressing potential gaps in service accessibility among Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
Assembly Bill 977, introduced by Assembly Member Mark Stone, aims to enhance access to Medi-Cal services for children by ensuring timely provision of Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) services. This legislation mandates the California Department of Health Care Services to conduct a review of the California State Auditor's Report 2018-111, which focuses on children's access to care and preventative services within the Medi-Cal program. The bill intends to address the findings of the auditor's report and improve the delivery of essential health services to low-income children under the age of 21.
The sentiment surrounding AB 977 is largely supportive, particularly among health advocates and organizations focused on child welfare. Proponents argue that the bill is a crucial step toward rectifying access issues that have persisted within the Medi-Cal system, especially for vulnerable children who depend on these services. The emphasis on public commentary also indicates a commitment to transparency and community input, which is generally viewed positively by stakeholders invested in healthcare improvement.
While there seems to be broad support for the intentions of AB 977, potential points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of the recommendations from the auditor's report. Some skepticism might exist around the state's ability to effectively act on these findings and whether adequate resources will be allocated for necessary improvements within the Medi-Cal program. Critics could also express concerns over the bureaucratic process and whether it will lead to meaningful advancements in access to care.