California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB985

Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Pupil nutrition: whole milk and 2 percent milk: elementary school pilot programs.

Impact

If enacted, AB 985 would modify existing California Education Code provisions concerning pupil nutrition. While maintaining the requirement for schools to provide nutritionally adequate meals, it introduces the option to pilot whole and 2 percent milk consumption. This could lead to broader discussions regarding nutrition standards in schools and may potentially impact the types of beverages offered to students, aiming to enhance overall health and dietary preferences among pupils during critical developmental years.

Summary

Assembly Bill 985, introduced by Assembly Member Robert Rivas, aims to amend existing education laws to allow local educational agencies to establish pilot programs that evaluate the impact of whole or 2 percent unflavored milk consumption in elementary schools. The bill seeks to enhance pupil nutrition by facilitating the provision of these types of milk within the frameworks of state and federal guidelines, while ensuring that schools can partner with private organizations for funding. The bill specifically defines the roles and responsibilities of participating schools and local educational agencies while outlining compliance with federal regulations, particularly in relation to the National School Lunch Program.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 985 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents, who view it as a progressive step toward improving child nutrition and allowing schools greater flexibility in how they meet dietary needs. However, there are concerns from some quarters regarding potential implications for funding and federal reimbursement, particularly since the bill prohibits seeking federal cash reimbursement for whole milk under certain circumstances. This aspect might lead to debates among stakeholders about the balance between nutritional goals and financial feasibility.

Contention

One notable contention surrounding AB 985 is the prohibition on seeking federal cash reimbursement for whole milk. Critics argue this could deter schools from participating in pilot programs due to potential financial losses. Additionally, concerns exist about whether the introduction of whole and 2 percent milk consumption aligns with broader health initiatives aimed at combating childhood obesity and promoting healthier dietary habits within schools. These debates emphasize the need for careful consideration of nutritional standards in educational settings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2316

Pupil nutrition: substances: prohibition.

CA AB1264

Pupil nutrition: particularly harmful ultraprocessed food: prohibition.

PA SR119

Urging the Congress of the United States to support the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025 and amend or repeal Federal law relating to program requirements in order to allow for the availability of whole milk and 2% reduced fat milk, flavored or unflavored, in elementary and secondary schools in Pennsylvania and urging the United States Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Health and Human Services to update Federal standards relating to the establishment of dietary guidelines in order to permit the availability of whole milk and 2% reduced fat milk, flavored or unflavored, in elementary and secondary schools in Pennsylvania.

CA AB95

Pupil nutrition: pupil meals.

CA AB691

Pupil nutrition: almond milk.

CA AB1625

Unflavored tobacco list.

PA SB297

Authorizing the provision or sale of Pennsylvania milk in Pennsylvania schools.

PA HB997

Authorizing the provision or sale of Pennsylvania milk in Pennsylvania schools.