California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB998

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Enrolled
7/1/19  
Enrolled
7/1/19  
Chaptered
7/12/19  
Chaptered
7/12/19  
Passed
7/12/19  

Caption

State scenic highways: State Route 128.

Impact

The legislative provisions of AB 998 will formally include State Route 128 within the existing framework of California's scenic highway system. This alignment is significant as it not only signifies state recognition but also entails a series of regulatory and developmental standards that local administrations will need to adhere to for developments along this route. The designation serves to facilitate the collaborative efforts between the state and local authorities in ensuring that the scenic integrity of the highway is maintained, potentially enhancing property values and local tourism.

Summary

Assembly Bill 998, introduced by Assemblymember Aguiar-Curry, amends Section 263.1 of the Streets and Highways Code to designate State Route 128 as a part of California's state scenic highway system. This inclusion is contingent upon the implementation of certain scenic highway standards, underscoring the importance of corridor protection programs within the state's infrastructure management. The scenic highway designation aims to enhance and preserve the aesthetic qualities of these routes, thereby promoting tourism and protecting natural landscapes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 998 appears to be positive among lawmakers and environmental advocates who see the designation of scenic highways as a beneficial measure for preserving natural beauty and promoting economic activities that rely on the scenic attributes of the region. Supporters believe that protecting the visual and environmental aspects of highways can lead to improved community engagement and support for regional sustainability initiatives. However, discussions indicate there may be concerns regarding the regulatory implications for local governments and property owners adjacent to the newly designated scenic route.

Contention

While the bill received broad support and was passed unanimously with a recorded vote of 39-0, the potential contention surrounding AB 998 may arise from local stakeholders who may fear increased regulation and restrictions on land use along State Route 128. The balance between maintaining scenic beauty and accommodating local development interests will be a critical point of dialogue as the implications of the bill unfold. Local governance may seek to navigate the challenges of preserving natural landscapes while still promoting economic development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2082

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

CA SB606

State highways: State Route 203: reduction.

CA AB250

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA ACR126

Sergeant Nicole Gee, United States Marine Corps Memorial Highway.

CA SB710

Sale of excess state highway property: State Highway Route 710 Terminus.

CA AB2333

State highways: airspace leases: report.

CA ACR124

Sergeant Damon Christopher Gutzwiller Memorial Highway.

CA AB824

Highway greening: statewide strategic plan.

CA ACR98

CHP Officer Andy Ornelas Memorial Highway

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.