California Assembly Bill ACA3

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/19
• Refer: 3/18/19
• Report Pass: 3/20/19
• Refer: 3/21/19

Caption

Clean Water for All Act.

Impact

The implementation of ACA 3 would create a reliable financial mechanism to support vital water projects throughout California. The legislation ensures that funding is continuously appropriated for initiatives aimed at improving water infrastructure and delivery systems. Furthermore, by assigning specific percentages of the General Fund, ACA 3 aims to prioritize the maintenance and development of a resilient water system, catering to the increasing demands of both residents and agricultural sectors in California. This commitment is especially crucial given the state’s history of droughts and public health concerns related to poor water quality.

Summary

Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 3, known as the Clean Water for All Act, proposes an amendment to the California Constitution aiming to guarantee funding for water quality and supply projects. Specifically, the measure mandates that at least 2% of certain state revenues must be allocated towards the repayment of bonds authorized under the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014, as well as to finance water supply, delivery, and quality projects. This emphasis on funding comes in response to California's ongoing challenges related to water scarcity and pollution, underscoring the need for long-term, sustainable water management.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards ACA 3 has been largely positive among supporters, including environmental advocates and lawmakers prioritizing sustainable water practices. Proponents argue that the required funding would bolster California's response to water crises and help restore public trust in water quality management. However, concerns exist among some stakeholders who worry about the implications for budget allocations and the potential limits on funding for other critical state services to ensure water projects are fully funded. This tension reflects broader debates about resource prioritization amidst competing public needs.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding ACA 3 focus on the allocation percentages and the implications for fiscal flexibility within the state's budget. Critics argue that by committing a fixed percentage of revenues to specific projects, the bill could create funding shortfalls in other areas, particularly in education and public health, which could detract from the holistic governance approach. Additionally, some lawmakers question whether the established processes for utilizing these funds will allow for effective oversight and targeted action on the most pressing water quality issues.