California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1420

Introduced
2/16/24  
Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Report Pass
4/29/24  
Report Pass
4/29/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/20/24  
Report Pass
6/20/24  
Refer
6/24/24  
Report Pass
7/8/24  
Refer
7/8/24  
Refer
7/8/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  
Passed
9/25/24  

Caption

Hydrogen production facilities: certification and environmental review.

Impact

The enactment of SB 1420 significantly alters the classification of energy projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Previously, hydrogen-related endeavors faced limitations that hindered their certification as energy infrastructure projects. By broadening these definitions and including hydrogen production facilities for certification, local agencies will have to engage in more comprehensive environmental reviews. However, this also creates potential for faster approvals and streamlined processes for eligible projects, thus fostering growth in the state's green energy sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 1420, introduced by Senator Caballero, seeks to amend specific sections of the Public Resources Code with an emphasis on hydrogen production facilities. The bill expands the scope of facilities that can be certified as environmental leadership development projects by the Energy Commission to include hydrogen production facilities that utilize methods not reliant on fossil fuels, underlining California's commitment to sustainable energy production. This initiative aligns with the state's broader environmental goals by encouraging facilities that adopt green technologies and receive state and federal funding.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1420 appears to be largely supportive within environmental circles, as it promotes renewable energy and the transition away from fossil fuel dependency. Stakeholders recognize the need for innovative energy solutions in response to climate challenges. However, there are some reservations regarding the expanded powers granted to the Governor for certifying additional projects, as opponents argue that this could lead to insufficient local scrutiny and oversight.

Contention

One primary point of contention with SB 1420 involves the bill's provision that no reimbursement is required for costs imposed on local governments due to the expanded definitions and processes related to hydrogen projects. Critics express concern that this could place an undue financial burden on local agencies, potentially compromising their ability to effectively manage environmental reviews and community impacts related to hydrogen projects. Overall, while the intent of the bill aims at advancing sustainable energy initiatives, the implications for local governance and environmental accountability are areas marked by ongoing debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1342

California Environmental Quality Act: infrastructure projects: County of San Diego.

CA AB839

California Environmental Quality Act: expedited judicial review: sustainable aviation fuel projects.

CA AB2190

California Environmental Quality Act: expedited judicial review: infrastructure projects: hydrogen.

CA AB3114

California Environmental Quality Act: expedited judicial review: sustainable aviation fuel projects.

CA AB531

Geothermal powerplants and geothermal field development projects: certification and environmental review.

CA SB541

Electricity: load shifting: dynamic pricing.

CA SB149

California Environmental Quality Act: administrative and judicial procedures: record of proceedings: judicial streamlining.

CA AB434

Battery energy storage facilities.