CHP Sergeant Steven L. Licon Memorial Highway.
The passage of ACR 107 not only serves as a symbolic gesture to remember and honor fallen officers but also reinforces the state’s commitment to recognizing law enforcement personnel who have made the ultimate sacrifice. By officially designating this portion of the highway, the bill aims to foster a sense of community pride and awareness about the sacrifices made by public servants like Sergeant Licon. Moreover, the resolution includes provisions for the Department of Transportation to erect appropriate signage to commemorate this designation, albeit contingent on obtaining donations to cover costs.
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 107 (ACR 107) designates a segment of Interstate 15, located near Lake Elsinore in Riverside County, as the CHP Sergeant Steven L. Licon Memorial Highway. This resolution honors the legacy and service of Sergeant Steven Licon, a dedicated member of the California Highway Patrol (CHP), who tragically lost his life in the line of duty in 2019. The resolution highlights not only his commitment to law enforcement but also his significant contributions to the community through various roles he undertook during his career with the CHP.
The sentiment surrounding ACR 107 has been generally positive, reflecting a community united in their respect and appreciation for law enforcement officers. Supporters of the bill, including legislators and community members, view the designation as a fitting tribute to Sergeant Licon’s dedication and service, promoting awareness and respect for those in the law enforcement profession. There is a collective sentiment of gratitude for the sacrifices made by officers, which resonates strongly within the local community and beyond.
Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding ACR 107 may arise primarily from differing views on how law enforcement officers are memorialized. While many support the resolution as a way to honor service and sacrifice, there can also be underlying discussions about the role of police in communities, especially given recent national dialogues on policing. Such discussions could bring about debates regarding how memorials reflect current attitudes towards law enforcement, the appropriateness of honoring law enforcement figures in all contexts, and how communities wish to engage with such memorials moving forward.