California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR161 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 161Introduced by Assembly Member GallagherFebruary 05, 2020 Relative to the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 161, as introduced, Gallagher. Farm-to-Fork Corridor.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 99 in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, Farmers in the Counties of Butte, Sutter, Tehama, and Yuba have provided fresh agricultural commodities and produce to Californians for generations; andWHEREAS, Farmers in these counties continue to provide quality agricultural commodities and produce to the City of Sacramento and the greater United States; andWHEREAS, The City of Sacramento is known as Americas Farm-to-Fork Capital; andWHEREAS, High-quality agricultural commodities and produce are frequently transported to the City of Sacramento and the greater United States via State Route 99; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature designates the portion of State Route 99 from post mile 20.44 at Eldrid Avenue near the community of Dairyville to post mile 24.57 near Arch Street in the City of Red Bluff in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor; and be it furtherResolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of appropriate signs consistent with the signage requirements for the state highway system showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 161Introduced by Assembly Member GallagherFebruary 05, 2020 Relative to the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 161, as introduced, Gallagher. Farm-to-Fork Corridor.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 99 in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	Assembly Concurrent Resolution
12	12
13	13	No. 161
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Assembly Member GallagherFebruary 05, 2020
16	16
17	17	Introduced by Assembly Member Gallagher
18	18	February 05, 2020
19	19
20	20	Relative to the Farm-to-Fork Corridor.
21	21
22	22	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
25	25
26	26	ACR 161, as introduced, Gallagher. Farm-to-Fork Corridor.
27	27
28	28	This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 99 in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs.
29	29
30	30	This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 99 in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs.
31	31
32	32	## Digest Key
33	33
34	34	## Bill Text
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, Farmers in the Counties of Butte, Sutter, Tehama, and Yuba have provided fresh agricultural commodities and produce to Californians for generations; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, Farmers in these counties continue to provide quality agricultural commodities and produce to the City of Sacramento and the greater United States; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, The City of Sacramento is known as Americas Farm-to-Fork Capital; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, High-quality agricultural commodities and produce are frequently transported to the City of Sacramento and the greater United States via State Route 99; now, therefore, be it
43	43
44	44	Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature designates the portion of State Route 99 from post mile 20.44 at Eldrid Avenue near the community of Dairyville to post mile 24.57 near Arch Street in the City of Red Bluff in the County of Tehama as the Farm-to-Fork Corridor; and be it further
45	45
46	46	Resolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of appropriate signs consistent with the signage requirements for the state highway system showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover that cost, to erect those signs; and be it further
47	47
48	48	Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.