California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AR34 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 34Introduced by Assembly Member McCartyMay 02, 2019 Relative to Loving Day. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 34, as introduced, McCarty. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, Mildred and Richard Loving were an interracial couple who were married in Washington, D.C., in 1958, but banned from their home state of Virginia, where interracial marriage was illegal at the time; andWHEREAS, The Lovings eventually challenged this ruling; their case was eventually taken up by the American Civil Liberties Union, and went through many levels of the justice system before the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided in 1967 that the Lovings marriage should be upheld in all states; and WHEREAS, At the time of the Loving decision, 16 states had laws banning interracial couples and the Loving decision made it illegal for these states to enforce those laws; andWHEREAS, Loving Day was founded in 2004 and has since garnered support from thousands of people domestically and internationally, organizations, and publications; and WHEREAS, The Loving Day celebrations aim to create a common connection between multicultural communities, groups, and individuals; andWHEREAS, Loving Days mission is to fight racial prejudice, promote tolerance, awareness, and understanding through education, and foster supportive multicultural communities; and WHEREAS, Loving Day seeks to commemorate and celebrate the United States Supreme Courts 1967 ruling, keeping its importance fresh in the minds of a generation that has grown up with interracial relationships being legal, as well as explore issues facing couples currently in interracial relationships; andWHEREAS, California has led the marriage equality movement, beginning 61 years ago, by striking down laws prohibiting marriage between interracial couples (Perez v. Sharp (1948) 32 Cal.2d 711); and WHEREAS, The county clerk who denied Andrea Perez and Sylvester Davis a marriage license in 1947 applied Sections 60 and 69 of the Civil Code; and WHEREAS, Section 69 of the Civil Code provided that no license may be issued authorizing the marriage of a white person with a Negro, mulatto, Mongolian or member of the Malay race; andWHEREAS, On October 1, 1948, the California Supreme Court ruled in Andrea and Sylvesters favor by a 4-3 vote; and WHEREAS, California became the first court in the 20th century to strike down an antimiscegenation law; andWHEREAS, The California State Assembly has a history of supporting movements and legislation that celebrate the diversity and equality of all persons; andWHEREAS, We are now moving forward in the 21st century as a multiracial and multicultural society and realize we must find a common vision from our interwoven past to build a society free of racism for the benefit of our collective future; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That Tuesday, June 12, 2019, be observed as the official commemoration of the landmark Supreme Court decision, Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, which legalized interracial marriage in the United States and celebrated as Loving Day; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly provide copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 34Introduced by Assembly Member McCartyMay 02, 2019 Relative to Loving Day. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 34, as introduced, McCarty. Digest Key
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	House Resolution No. 34
12	12
13	13	Introduced by Assembly Member McCartyMay 02, 2019
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty
16	16	May 02, 2019
17	17
18	18	Relative to Loving Day.
19	19
20	20	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
21	21
22	22	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	HR 34, as introduced, McCarty.
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28	## Digest Key
29	29
30	30	## Bill Text
31	31
32	32	WHEREAS, Mildred and Richard Loving were an interracial couple who were married in Washington, D.C., in 1958, but banned from their home state of Virginia, where interracial marriage was illegal at the time; and
33	33
34	34	WHEREAS, The Lovings eventually challenged this ruling; their case was eventually taken up by the American Civil Liberties Union, and went through many levels of the justice system before the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided in 1967 that the Lovings marriage should be upheld in all states; and
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, At the time of the Loving decision, 16 states had laws banning interracial couples and the Loving decision made it illegal for these states to enforce those laws; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, Loving Day was founded in 2004 and has since garnered support from thousands of people domestically and internationally, organizations, and publications; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, The Loving Day celebrations aim to create a common connection between multicultural communities, groups, and individuals; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, Loving Days mission is to fight racial prejudice, promote tolerance, awareness, and understanding through education, and foster supportive multicultural communities; and
43	43
44	44	WHEREAS, Loving Day seeks to commemorate and celebrate the United States Supreme Courts 1967 ruling, keeping its importance fresh in the minds of a generation that has grown up with interracial relationships being legal, as well as explore issues facing couples currently in interracial relationships; and
45	45
46	46	WHEREAS, California has led the marriage equality movement, beginning 61 years ago, by striking down laws prohibiting marriage between interracial couples (Perez v. Sharp (1948) 32 Cal.2d 711); and
47	47
48	48	WHEREAS, The county clerk who denied Andrea Perez and Sylvester Davis a marriage license in 1947 applied Sections 60 and 69 of the Civil Code; and
49	49
50	50	WHEREAS, Section 69 of the Civil Code provided that no license may be issued authorizing the marriage of a white person with a Negro, mulatto, Mongolian or member of the Malay race; and
51	51
52	52	WHEREAS, On October 1, 1948, the California Supreme Court ruled in Andrea and Sylvesters favor by a 4-3 vote; and
53	53
54	54	WHEREAS, California became the first court in the 20th century to strike down an antimiscegenation law; and
55	55
56	56	WHEREAS, The California State Assembly has a history of supporting movements and legislation that celebrate the diversity and equality of all persons; and
57	57
58	58	WHEREAS, We are now moving forward in the 21st century as a multiracial and multicultural society and realize we must find a common vision from our interwoven past to build a society free of racism for the benefit of our collective future; now, therefore, be it
59	59
60	60	Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That Tuesday, June 12, 2019, be observed as the official commemoration of the landmark Supreme Court decision, Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, which legalized interracial marriage in the United States and celebrated as Loving Day; and be it further
61	61
62	62	Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly provide copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.