California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AR53 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 53Introduced by Assembly Members Limn and CarrilloAugust 12, 2019 Relative to the United States Womens National Soccer Team and pay parity. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 53, as introduced, Limn. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, The United States Womens National Soccer Team (USWNST) is ranked number one in the world and on July 7, 2019, won their fourth Womens World Cup; andWHEREAS, The class action lawsuit filed by the USWNST against the United States Soccer Federation (USSF), their employer, claims players on the USWNST are not treated as equals to the mens national soccer team; andWHEREAS, The Wall Street Journal reported new marketing deals focused around equality for women that suggest there are signs the U.S. womens equal-pay fight has spurred more marketing deals for the federation. One sign is the record sales of the USWNSTs home jersey. Nike chief executive Mark Parker reported the jersey is now the number one soccer jersey, mens or womens, ever sold on Nike.com in one season; andWHEREAS, There was a longstanding gap between revenue generated by the men and women, but that has disappeared in recent years. The womens team contributed close to or more than one-half of the federations revenue from games since fiscal year 2016. Overall, from fiscal year 2016 to fiscal year 2018, the womens games generated about $900,000 more revenue than the mens games. In the year following the 2015 Womens World Cup win, womens games generated $1.9 million more than the mens games. In recent years, the mens revenue tally also includes the fees that opposing teams pay in order to play the United States; andWHEREAS, Looking only at game revenue, USSFs own financial statements make clear that the USWNST has held its own in comparison to the mens team since fiscal year 2016; andWHEREAS, More than 50 years after the passage of the federal Equal Pay Act, women, especially minority women, continue to suffer the consequences of unequal pay; andWHEREAS, According to data from the United States Census Bureau, the gender wage gap for full-time, year-round workers in California is $0.80 on the dollar, resulting in California women earning approximately $7,000 a year less than men; both African American women and Latinas earn close to what African American men and Latinos earn. However, full-time working women of color earn less than White women and markedly less than White men. The median salary of full-time working White men is $71,164; African American women earn 61 percent and Latinas earn 53 percent of what White men earn. California women who work full time earn less than men in each of the five broadest occupational categories reported by the United States Census Bureau; andWHEREAS, According to a report by the National Partnership for Women & Families, women in California earned a median of $0.84 for each dollar earned by men as of October 2014; andWHEREAS, According to The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap, a report by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), the gender pay gap is even larger for women of color, where African American women earned 63 percent and Latina women earned 54 percent of what men earned in 2014; andWHEREAS, According to Graduating to a Pay Gap, a 2012 research report by the AAUW, the gender pay gap is evident one year after college graduation, even after controlling for factors known to affect earnings, such as occupation, hours worked, and college major; andWHEREAS, In 2011, the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce found that college-educated women working full time earn $650,000 less than their male peers do over the course of a lifetime; andWHEREAS, In 2009, the federal Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law, which gives back to employees their day in court to challenge an unlawful pay gap, now we must pass federal legislation to amend the federal Equal Pay Act to close loopholes and improve the acts effectiveness; andWHEREAS, In 2015, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 358, which enacted the California Fair Pay Act, strengthening the states existing Equal Pay Act by eliminating loopholes that prevent effective enforcement of gender-based discrimination and empowering employees to discuss pay without fear of retaliation, providing one more tool to tackle the problem; andWHEREAS, Almost two-thirds of women in California are employed and nearly four in 10 mothers are primary breadwinners in their households. Two-thirds of mothers are primary or significant earners, making pay equity critical to families economic security; andWHEREAS, A lifetime of lower pay means women have less income to save for retirement and less income counted in a social security or pension benefit formula; andWHEREAS, Fair pay equity policies can be implemented simply and without undue costs or hardship in both the public and private sectors as evidenced by the work of the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls; andWHEREAS, Fair pay strengthens the security of families today and eases future retirement costs while enhancing the American economy; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly proclaims its support for the United States Womens National Soccer Teams continued fight towards pay parity, on and off the field; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION House Resolution No. 53Introduced by Assembly Members Limn and CarrilloAugust 12, 2019 Relative to the United States Womens National Soccer Team and pay parity. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTHR 53, as introduced, Limn. Digest Key
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	House Resolution
12	12
13	13	No. 53
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Assembly Members Limn and CarrilloAugust 12, 2019
16	16
17	17	Introduced by Assembly Members Limn and Carrillo
18	18	August 12, 2019
19	19
20	20	Relative to the United States Womens National Soccer Team and pay parity.
21	21
22	22	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
25	25
26	26	HR 53, as introduced, Limn.
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30	## Digest Key
31	31
32	32	## Bill Text
33	33
34	34	WHEREAS, The United States Womens National Soccer Team (USWNST) is ranked number one in the world and on July 7, 2019, won their fourth Womens World Cup; and
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, The class action lawsuit filed by the USWNST against the United States Soccer Federation (USSF), their employer, claims players on the USWNST are not treated as equals to the mens national soccer team; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, The Wall Street Journal reported new marketing deals focused around equality for women that suggest there are signs the U.S. womens equal-pay fight has spurred more marketing deals for the federation. One sign is the record sales of the USWNSTs home jersey. Nike chief executive Mark Parker reported the jersey is now the number one soccer jersey, mens or womens, ever sold on Nike.com in one season; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, There was a longstanding gap between revenue generated by the men and women, but that has disappeared in recent years. The womens team contributed close to or more than one-half of the federations revenue from games since fiscal year 2016. Overall, from fiscal year 2016 to fiscal year 2018, the womens games generated about $900,000 more revenue than the mens games. In the year following the 2015 Womens World Cup win, womens games generated $1.9 million more than the mens games. In recent years, the mens revenue tally also includes the fees that opposing teams pay in order to play the United States; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, Looking only at game revenue, USSFs own financial statements make clear that the USWNST has held its own in comparison to the mens team since fiscal year 2016; and
43	43
44	44	WHEREAS, More than 50 years after the passage of the federal Equal Pay Act, women, especially minority women, continue to suffer the consequences of unequal pay; and
45	45
46	46	WHEREAS, According to data from the United States Census Bureau, the gender wage gap for full-time, year-round workers in California is $0.80 on the dollar, resulting in California women earning approximately $7,000 a year less than men; both African American women and Latinas earn close to what African American men and Latinos earn. However, full-time working women of color earn less than White women and markedly less than White men. The median salary of full-time working White men is $71,164; African American women earn 61 percent and Latinas earn 53 percent of what White men earn. California women who work full time earn less than men in each of the five broadest occupational categories reported by the United States Census Bureau; and
47	47
48	48	WHEREAS, According to a report by the National Partnership for Women & Families, women in California earned a median of $0.84 for each dollar earned by men as of October 2014; and
49	49
50	50	WHEREAS, According to The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap, a report by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), the gender pay gap is even larger for women of color, where African American women earned 63 percent and Latina women earned 54 percent of what men earned in 2014; and
51	51
52	52	WHEREAS, According to Graduating to a Pay Gap, a 2012 research report by the AAUW, the gender pay gap is evident one year after college graduation, even after controlling for factors known to affect earnings, such as occupation, hours worked, and college major; and
53	53
54	54	WHEREAS, In 2011, the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce found that college-educated women working full time earn $650,000 less than their male peers do over the course of a lifetime; and
55	55
56	56	WHEREAS, In 2009, the federal Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law, which gives back to employees their day in court to challenge an unlawful pay gap, now we must pass federal legislation to amend the federal Equal Pay Act to close loopholes and improve the acts effectiveness; and
57	57
58	58	WHEREAS, In 2015, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 358, which enacted the California Fair Pay Act, strengthening the states existing Equal Pay Act by eliminating loopholes that prevent effective enforcement of gender-based discrimination and empowering employees to discuss pay without fear of retaliation, providing one more tool to tackle the problem; and
59	59
60	60	WHEREAS, Almost two-thirds of women in California are employed and nearly four in 10 mothers are primary breadwinners in their households. Two-thirds of mothers are primary or significant earners, making pay equity critical to families economic security; and
61	61
62	62	WHEREAS, A lifetime of lower pay means women have less income to save for retirement and less income counted in a social security or pension benefit formula; and
63	63
64	64	WHEREAS, Fair pay equity policies can be implemented simply and without undue costs or hardship in both the public and private sectors as evidenced by the work of the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls; and
65	65
66	66	WHEREAS, Fair pay strengthens the security of families today and eases future retirement costs while enhancing the American economy; now, therefore, be it
67	67
68	68	Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly proclaims its support for the United States Womens National Soccer Teams continued fight towards pay parity, on and off the field; and be it further
69	69
70	70	Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.