Gas corporations: renewable gas procurement.
The implementation of SB 1352 is projected to transform the landscape of energy procurement among gas corporations in California. By requiring the procurement of renewable gas, the bill aligns with existing climate goals and targets for emissions reduction, specifically focusing on the reduction of short-lived climate pollutants. California's Public Utilities Commission will be empowered to evaluate and ensure that such procurement goals are cost-effective and comply with state and federal regulations, aiming to enhance the sustainability of gas supply chains.
Senate Bill 1352, introduced by Senator Hueso, aims to amend the Public Utilities Code to establish a biomethane renewable gas procurement program. The bill mandates that each gas corporation in California must procure at least 20% of the total volume of gas delivered to core customers from biomethane by January 1, 2030. This initiative is positioned as part of California's broader efforts to promote renewable energy sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions contributing to climate change.
The sentiment regarding SB 1352 appears generally positive among environmentalists and advocates for renewable energy. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward a greener energy future and aligns with the state’s commitment to climate action. However, there may be concerns raised by stakeholders in the traditional gas supply chain who could view regulatory changes and procurement mandates as burdensome or economically challenging.
Notable points of contention surrounding SB 1352 include the potential financial implications for gas corporations, particularly regarding how these new procurement requirements may impact operational costs and pricing for consumers. There are also discussions about the compliance burden that such legislation imposes, given that violations of the Public Utilities Act can lead to criminal charges. Furthermore, the bill specifies that no reimbursement is required for local agencies affected by these changes, which might raise issues regarding funding and resource allocation at the local level.