California Senate Bill SB212

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/19
• Refer: 2/13/19
• Refer: 3/21/19
• Report Pass: 4/23/19
• Refer: 4/23/19
• Engrossed: 5/28/19
• Refer: 6/6/19
• Refer: 6/25/19
• Report Pass: 7/8/19
• Refer: 7/9/19
• Refer: 8/12/19
• Report Pass: 8/14/19
• Enrolled: 9/11/19
• Vetoed: 10/13/19

Caption

Elections: local voting methods.

Impact

The potential impact of SB 212 on state laws is significant. By enabling ranked choice voting in local elections, the bill seeks to enhance voter engagement and satisfaction. Anecdotal evidence from jurisdictions that already use ranked choice voting suggests that it can lead to higher voter turnout and a more positive electoral experience. However, there is also an administrative consideration, as local jurisdictions must ensure that they have the necessary technology and procedures in place to implement this voting system.

Summary

Senate Bill 212, introduced by Senator Allen, addresses the methods of conducting elections in local jurisdictions by allowing the use of ranked choice voting. This bill aims to empower general law cities, counties, school districts, and other educational agencies to conduct their elections using ranked choice voting, where voters rank candidates in order of preference. This legislation would require approval from local voters before implementation, providing them a say in how elections are conducted in their respective jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 212 appears to be supportive among advocacy groups and voters seeking electoral reform, as it aligns with a broader movement towards more inclusive voting practices. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the feasibility of transitioning to ranked choice voting, especially in areas lacking technological resources. Opponents may view the implementation process as complex and potentially costly, leading to apprehension regarding its adoption.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions surrounding SB 212 is the logistical and technological capacity needed for local jurisdictions to successfully implement ranked choice voting. Critics raise concerns that without adequate preparation, the execution of such elections could be problematic, leading to confusion among voters and complications in the vote-counting process. Furthermore, there are discussions about whether this method of voting adequately represents the preferences of constituents, especially in cases where voters may be unfamiliar with the process.