California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB234

Introduced
2/7/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Enrolled
8/22/19  
Enrolled
8/22/19  
Chaptered
9/5/19  
Chaptered
9/5/19  
Passed
9/5/19  

Caption

Family daycare homes.

Impact

One of the key impacts of SB 234 is its provision for treating large family daycare homes (which care for up to 14 children) as residential properties under local ordinances. This status ensures that these facilities cannot be restricted by local governments in a manner that would hinder their operation. Furthermore, it nullifies any clauses in property agreements that may attempt to prohibit or restrict the operation of family daycare homes, thus broadening the scope for potential providers. The legislation also extends existing prohibitions against local business licenses for small family daycare homes to larger ones, reducing financial burdens on providers.

Summary

Senate Bill 234, introduced by Senator Skinner, aims to amend various sections of the Health and Safety Code concerning family daycare homes in California. The legislation acknowledges the critical shortage of regulated family daycare facilities, emphasizing the importance of such services for working parents and children's development. Through amendments, SB 234 seeks to streamline the licensing process for family daycare homes, making it more accessible and responsive to the needs of communities, particularly where safe and quality childcare is scarce.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 234 appears to be largely positive among supporters, particularly advocates for children and working families who see the bill as a significant step toward enhancing childcare accessibility. Critics, if any, may concern about the potential implications on local ordinances and the balance of community autonomy versus state regulation. Overall, the bill aligns with broader efforts to improve childcare quality and availability in the state, making it a timely and needed legislative action.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from the balancing act between state-level directives and local governance. Some local officials may express concern that the bill undermines their ability to regulate family daycare facilities according to local needs. Additionally, there may still be apprehensions regarding the safety and quality standards of family daycare homes, which are also addressed through the bill by assigning the State Fire Marshal the responsibility for updating safety regulations regularly. Thus, while intending to support family daycare providers, SB 234 also reinforces the need for continued oversight and standards to ensure child safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB479

Family daycare homes: secondary licensees.

CA AB2026

Disabilities: person-first terminology.

CA AB3313

Mandatory training: employment laws.

CA AB1038

Surplus residential property: City of Pasadena: City of South Pasadena.

CA SB80

Human services omnibus.

CA AB2478

Child Care and Development Services Act: Commission on Child Care Providers.

CA AB634

Density Bonus Law: affordability restrictions.

CA SB93

Employment: rehiring and retention: displaced workers: COVID-19 pandemic.