California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB235

Introduced
2/11/19  
Introduced
2/11/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
6/20/19  
Report Pass
6/20/19  
Refer
6/20/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Enrolled
9/13/19  
Enrolled
9/13/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  

Caption

Planning and zoning: housing production report: regional housing need allocation.

Impact

SB 235 reinforces the requirement for local governments to develop a general plan that includes a housing element, mandating annual reporting to the Department of Housing and Community Development about the number of new housing units. It aims to improve compliance with regional housing need assessments and streamline housing production processes. The legislation intends to create a more efficient planning framework that encourages housing development, but it also maintains strict criteria ensuring that local jurisdictions cannot lessen their housing obligations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 235, introduced by Senator Dodd, focuses on amending various sections of the Planning and Zoning Law related to housing, particularly the production report requirements and the allocation of regional housing needs. The bill permits the County of Napa and the City of Napa to collaboratively report housing production metrics, allowing one jurisdiction to report on the housing achievements of the other under certain conditions. This legislative change aims to enhance housing accountability and cooperation between these neighboring jurisdictions, addressing the unique challenges they face in meeting housing demands.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 235 has been generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step towards improved housing cooperation and accountability between local governments. Supporters argue that the bill's provisions will help increase the housing supply, align regional planning efforts, and ultimately address California's ongoing housing crisis. Conversely, there are concerns among critics who worry that such legislative mandates could lead to insufficient local control and may not adequately address the diverse needs of various communities within the state.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding SB 235 revolve around the balance of local versus state control in housing development. Critics fear that imposing state requirements may overlook local needs and priorities, potentially leading to developments that do not align with community values. Moreover, while the bill promotes collaboration between Napa County and the City of Napa, it raises questions about the broader implications for other regions that may not have similar collaborative arrangements. The legislative process has highlighted differing views on how best to address housing shortages and the role local governments should play in that effort.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3093

Land use: housing element.

CA AB1485

Housing development: streamlining.

CA AB831

Planning and zoning: housing: development application modifications.

CA AB3155

Subdivision Map Act: streamlined approval process: subdivisions.

CA AB168

Planning and zoning: annual report: housing development: streamlined approvals.

CA AB2746

Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments: agricultural employee housing.

CA SB423

Land use: streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments.

CA SB6

Local planning: housing: commercial zones.