California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB287

Introduced
2/13/19  
Introduced
2/13/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  

Caption

Commission on State Mandates: test claims: filing date.

Impact

This bill intends to facilitate clearer procedures for local agencies and school districts to seek reimbursement from the state for costs incurred due to state mandates. By refining the timeline for claims filing, SB287 aims to ensure that local governments are adequately compensated for the fiscal impacts of state policies. Proponents of the legislation argue that providing certainty regarding the filing period could alleviate the financial strain on local entities, allowing them to plan more effectively in their budgets and operations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 287, introduced by Senator Nielsen, seeks to amend Section 17551 of the Government Code regarding the procedure by which local governmental agencies can file claims for reimbursement of costs mandated by the state. The bill stipulates that any local agency or school district claiming increased costs due to state mandates must submit their claim within a specified timeframe. Currently, claims must be filed no later than 12 months after the effective date of the relevant statute or executive order or within 12 months of incurring such increased costs. SB287 clarifies that the timeframe for filing a test claim is defined as by June 30 of the fiscal year following the year when the costs were incurred.

Contention

One potential point of contention related to SB287 may arise concerning the balance of authority between state and local governments. Critics may argue that while the bill seeks to provide clarity for reimbursement processes, it could inadvertently constrain local agencies by imposing strict deadlines for reimbursement claims. Additionally, questions may be raised about the adequacy of funding provided by the state in response to these claims, which are critical for local governments' operational capabilities. Ultimately, this amendment could provoke debate over the state's fiscal responsibilities towards local entities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB929

Special districts: Internet Web sites.

CA AB1728

Health care districts: board of directors.

CA AB246

Environmental quality: Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011.

CA AB2067

School safety: armed school resource officers.

CA SB1441

Examination of petitions: time limitations and reimbursement of costs.

CA AB2093

Public records: writing transmitted by electronic mail: retention.

CA SB529

Inspection of public records.

CA AB1645

Hydrogen fluoride: report.