California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB299

Introduced
2/14/19  
Introduced
2/14/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Personal information: minors: internet website: connected devices.

Impact

If enacted, SB 299 would refine the scope of existing laws surrounding data protection, particularly focusing on regulations that govern how personal information is collected and used for targeted marketing to minors. The new stipulations would mean enhanced transparency concerning data usage, mandating operators of online services to clarify the data being collected through a standardized privacy dashboard. Additionally, manufacturers of connected devices targeting minors will need to showcase comprehensive information about data collection, which includes details on cybersecurity practices, to ensure that both minors and their guardians are adequately informed about the protection of their personal data.

Summary

Senate Bill 299, introduced by Senator Jackson, aims to enhance the protection of personal information of minors who use connected devices and internet services. The bill amends existing laws to ensure that businesses that operate online services directed at minors must implement stricter measures regarding data privacy. It seeks to require these operators to refrain from using the personal information of minors to tailor content based on sensitive characteristics such as race, religion, or gender identity. The bill establishes that such practices pose risks to the integrity and safety of minors in digital environments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 299 appears largely supportive among advocates for children's rights and privacy protection. They view the bill as a significant step forward in safeguarding minors from exploitation in the digital space. However, there have also been concerns raised by some in the technology industry regarding the implications of such regulations on innovation and operational flexibility. Critics argue that while the intentions are laudable, the practical execution of these measures could impose undue burdens on smaller businesses, who may struggle to comply with stringent regulations.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the potential conflict between the enforcement of data privacy measures and the freedom of online services to operate without extensive restrictions. Opponents of the bill worry that the prohibitions against using minors' personal information to target content could limit useful learning opportunities for children online. On the other hand, proponents emphasize the necessity of creating a safer digital environment that exclusively prioritizes the welfare of minors. The ongoing debate encapsulates the broader discussion of balancing consumer protection with business interests in a developing technological landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1971

Administration of standardized tests.

CA SB327

Information privacy: connected devices.

CA AB801

Student privacy: online personal information.

CA AB1159

Student personal information.

CA SB1121

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

CA AB375

Privacy: personal information: businesses.

CA AB1552

Healing arts: foreign dental schools.

CA AB2182

Privacy: personal information: breach: disclosure.