California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB40

Introduced
12/3/18  
Introduced
12/3/18  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/13/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/20/19  
Engrossed
5/20/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/6/19  
Enrolled
9/6/19  
Chaptered
10/2/19  
Chaptered
10/2/19  

Caption

Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders.

Impact

The bill modifies the existing procedures for appointing conservators in California's Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, and the City and County of San Francisco. It changes the automatic termination period of a conservatorship from one year to six months unless otherwise specified by the court. The intention is to provide more robust oversight of conservatees' compliance and treatment progress. Additionally, now conservators are mandated to submit progress reports to the court every 60 days, allowing for frequent assessments of the conservatorship's necessity.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 40, known as the Conservatorship Bill, addresses the needs of individuals suffering from serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders. This legislation allows for a temporary conservatorship to be established for persons deemed incapable of caring for themselves due to their mental health conditions. Specifically, if an individual has been detained for evaluation and treatment eight or more times within a 12-month period, the court may appoint a conservator for a maximum of 28 days to ensure the individual's health and wellbeing.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 40 has been largely positive among mental health advocates who emphasize the need for more responsive and accountable approaches to managing the care of individuals with serious mental illnesses. Supporters argue that the ability to appoint a temporary conservator will streamline necessary interventions while still providing individuals with legal rights, such as demanding a trial to contest the conservatorship. However, some critics express concerns about the potential for misuse of the conservatorship process, especially regarding patients' autonomy and rights.

Contention

Key points of contention it aims to address include the criteria for establishing conservatorships, the rights of individuals during proceedings, and oversight mechanisms for treatment efficacy. The bill aims to strike a balance between protecting those unable to care for themselves and ensuring personal freedoms are respected. Additionally, provisions for conducting evaluations and gathering demographic data on conserved individuals aim to create a more effective support system and accountability structure for mental health interventions within these communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1251

Conservatorships: serious mental illness and substance use disorders: counties.

CA AB2679

Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders: County of Butte.

CA SB1045

Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders.

CA SB1303

Conservatorships: serious mental illness and substance use disorders: counties.

CA SB43

Behavioral health.

CA SB367

Mental health.