California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB424

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/13/19  

Caption

Tobacco products: single-use and multiuse components.

Impact

The bill significantly alters state laws regarding tobacco products, especially focusing on the environmental implications of single-use materials. By restricting the sale of single-use items, the legislation is expected to reduce environmental waste associated with single-use filters and electronic tobacco products. Furthermore, it mandates manufacturers to produce reusable components from recyclable materials, thus promoting sustainable practices within the tobacco industry. The bill aims to foster a culture of environmental responsibility among manufacturers and consumers alike.

Summary

Senate Bill 424, introduced by Senator Jackson, establishes stringent regulations concerning the sale and distribution of tobacco products, specifically targeting single-use filters and electronic vaporizer devices. The bill prohibits individuals and entities from selling, giving, or otherwise furnishing any cigarettes that utilize single-use filters or any form of single-use electronic cigarettes and vaporizers in California. This measure is part of efforts to restrict access to tobacco products, aligning with existing legislation aimed at protecting public health and reducing youth smoking rates.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 424 appears to be largely positive among public health advocates and environmental organizations, who see the bill as a necessary step toward minimizing both health risks associated with tobacco use and the environmental burden of tobacco waste. However, there may be concerns from tobacco business advocates who argue that such restrictions could unfairly impact sales and limit consumer choices.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 424 include the balance between regulating harmful products and allowing consumer choice. Some stakeholders may argue that the bill could lead to unintended consequences by pushing consumers towards unregulated black-market alternatives. Moreover, there may be debates on the feasibility of manufacturers adapting to the new requirements for reusable components and the potential economic impact on local businesses engaged in the tobacco market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1742

California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act: Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.

CA AB1627

Cigarette Tobacco Directory.

CA AB3218

Unflavored Tobacco List.

CA AB1639

Tobacco and cannabis products.

AZ HB2832

Luxury tax; electronic nicotine systems.

CT HB07181

An Act Concerning Enforcement Of The State's Cannabis, Hemp And Tobacco Laws.