California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB54

Introduced
12/11/18  
Introduced
12/11/18  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
2/25/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
5/7/19  
Refer
5/7/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
8/14/19  
Refer
8/14/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Refer
9/9/19  
Refer
9/9/19  
Refer
9/10/19  
Refer
9/10/19  

Caption

Solid waste: packaging and products.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to have substantial implications for state legislation around waste management and environmental protection. It aims to achieve a 75% reduction of waste from single-use packaging by 2030 through source reduction, recycling, and composting. By establishing stringent requirements for producers and retailers, SB54 aligns with California's long-term goals to minimize environmental degradation caused by plastic pollution. This regulatory scheme will also involve the creation of a new California Circular Economy Fund to finance the necessary administrative operations and compliance measures outlined in the bill.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 54, introduced by Senators Allen, Skinner, Stern, and Wiener, is designed to address the pressing issue of solid waste management, specifically concerning single-use packaging and products in California. The proposed bill enacts the California Circular Economy and Plastic Pollution Reduction Act, which aims to significantly reduce the waste generated from single-use plastics through a comprehensive regulatory framework. It mandates producers, retailers, and wholesalers to reduce single-use packaging and ensure that all applicable products sold in California are recyclable or compostable by specified deadlines, enhancing the state's efforts to promote environmental sustainability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB54 reflects a strong commitment to sustainability among its proponents, including various environmental advocacy groups. They laud the bill's potential to stabilize the impact of plastic waste on ecosystems while advancing public health initiatives. However, the discussion is not devoid of opposition; some entities argue against the burdens placed on manufacturers and local governments, criticizing the feasibility of compliance with new mandates and the potential economic strain it might impose on businesses.

Contention

Key points of contention within the discourse on SB54 include concerns regarding the bill's enforcement mechanisms and the implications for local regulatory authority. Some local agencies and stakeholders believe that the restrictions on how they can mandate food packaging within their jurisdictions could limit their ability to address specific community needs for waste management. Additionally, the bill's provisions regarding confidentiality for producers' data raised questions about the balance between regulatory compliance and transparency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1080

Solid waste: packaging and products.

CA AB842

California Circular Economy and Plastic Pollution Reduction Act.

CA AB863

Carpet recycling: producer responsibility organizations: fines: succession: training.

CA AB80

Carpet recycling.

CA SB1143

Paint products: stewardship program.

CA AB1526

Public resources.