California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB543

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
5/6/19  
Report Pass
5/6/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Report Pass
7/11/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Report Pass
8/14/19  
Enrolled
8/22/19  
Enrolled
8/22/19  
Chaptered
9/9/19  
Chaptered
9/9/19  

Caption

Pedicabs.

Impact

By deleting the repeal date of the existing alcohol consumption requirements, SB 543 solidifies these regulations into state law, which is expected to impact both pedicab operators and local jurisdictions overseeing their operation. The bill reinforces that pedicabs can only allow passengers to consume alcohol if their local ordinance permits it, maintaining local control over such activities. Furthermore, the bill specifies that alcoholic beverages can only be provided by passengers in sealed containers, ensuring that operators and staff do not sell or serve alcohol themselves.

Summary

Senate Bill 543, introduced by Senator Pan, addresses the operation and regulation of pedicabs in California, specifically concerning the consumption of alcoholic beverages onboard. The legislation seeks to extend provisions that require local ordinances to authorize alcohol consumption in pedicabs indefinitely. Previously, these provisions were set to expire on January 1, 2020. SB 543 mandates the presence of an onboard safety monitor aged 21 or older whenever alcohol is consumed on a pedicab, ensuring compliance with safety and regulatory standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 543 appears to be largely favorable, especially among proponents of safety regulations. Supporters argue that the bill enhances safety measures and promotes responsible alcohol consumption in a setting that can otherwise lead to unsafe practices. However, there may be concerns from local governments about the implications for ordinance enforcement and whether the added restrictions could deter businesses from operating pedicabs in their areas.

Contention

Notably, the bill introduces a state-mandated local program due to its enforcement provisions, which are seen as necessary yet could impose additional responsibilities on local agencies without state reimbursement. The California Constitution's provision exempting the state from reimbursement for such costs, since it involves the creation or modification of penalties or definitions of crimes, may raise concerns among local officials regarding their fiscal responsibilities. Thus, while the bill aims to provide clearer guidelines for pedicabs, the balance between state mandates and local governance remains a point of contention.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB934

Alcoholic beverages: possession: Mokelumne River.

CA AB1686

Energy consumption: report.

CA SB1283

Brewpub-restaurant licensees: beer sales.

CA AB2717

Driving under the influence: blood tests.

CA AB2212

California Retail Food Code: meal delivery services.

CA AB2537

Personal protective equipment: health care employees.

CA SB1315

Alcoholic beverages: consumption area permits.

CA AB784

Sales and use taxes: exemption: California Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project: transit buses.