If enacted, SB 60 would reinforce the existing policy that government employees do not receive an additional fee for their jury service, as they are already compensated through their employment. Consequently, this may impact the willingness of individuals employed by government entities to fulfill their jury duties, knowing that they will not receive additional remuneration. The clarification brought forth in SB 60 is intended to eliminate any confusion regarding the matter, ensuring that all applicable government employees are treated uniformly under the law when it comes to jury fees.
Senate Bill 60, introduced by Senator Atkins, aims to amend Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning jury duty compensation. The current law specifies a fee of $15 per day for jurors after the first day of service, with particular provisions for jurors who are employed by various government entities. This bill seeks to clarify that the prohibition of receiving the jury duty fee applies not only to federal and state employees but also explicitly to those employed by the Legislature, provided they continue to receive regular compensation while serving on a jury. This change serves to streamline the understanding of compensation regulations for government employees serving as jurors.
During discussions surrounding the bill, points of contention may arise regarding whether such restrictions could deter public servants from participating in jury duty, as they might feel that their service is undervalued without additional compensation. Proponents of the bill argue that this policy is essential for maintaining the integrity of jury service and ensuring that compensation practices remain straightforward. Opponents, however, may view it as a disincentive that could ultimately undermine the jury pool by dissuading government employees from serving.